>Rock band releases pop album
So, who did it better?
>thinking radiohead's entire discography isn't pop.
>>64737344
>thinking tame impala's entire discography isn't pop
>>64737266
arctic monkeys
>>64737344
Isn't only 50% of their discography "pop" and aren't they usually called an alt-rock band?
>>64737375
Neo-psychedelia =/= pop
>>64737379
Currents is DEFINITELY better than AM
>Radiohead
>rock band
>>64737439
>Neo-psychedelia =/= pop
>actually believing this
>>64737439
>Neo-psychedelia =/= pop
Good thing Tame Impala has only made psychedelic pop since Innerspeaker.
>>64737344
>>64737375
>>64737871
Enough semantics, who did it better???
>>64737914
Tom bones and da naughties
>>64737266
>>64737375
>>64737871
>>64737909
Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaan daaaaaaaaaaaaaayyy addddddddddaaaaa tyyyyyyyyyyyy
I'm liking Currents more than Pool honestly
>>64737967
Are you fucking twelve?
>>64738073
I agree. Alot of songs on Currents are pretty mediocre but those few songs that are legitimately awesome push it above AMSP.
>>64738203
what songs on currents do you consider legitimately awesome?
>>64737266
AMSP >>>>>>>> Currents
>>64738586
Let it Happen, Nangs, Gossip, and Disciples.
The worst part is that one of them is too long and the other three are too short.
Both of these albums are 9/10s for me but for very different reasons. They aren't comparable in the slightest. AMSP is in no way a pop album. Currents is in every way a pop album.
AMSP isn't even Radiohead's poppiest or most accessible album (That would be In Rainbows if you don't count their first two albums which are way too obvious)
>>64737266
a thing called
>pop rock
>>64737439
Except for a couple of tracks Lonerism is pop.
And that's not a bad thing at all
Radiohead by an enormous margin
Of course many loud mutants true to their contrarian impulses will say tame impala in the wake of moon's extreme critical acclaim even tho they were shitting on currents when it came out (and have been since)
Wtf why are these two bands being compared. One is neo-psychedelia, the other is not.
