Well?
>>64693138
*CBR
and V0 is better
V0 generally
320 for albums I like
FLAC for albums I love
Why? Don't you want a good audio experience with every single album you listen to?
192 CBR for most albums
320 CBR for albums with great production
ALAC for albums with god-tier production and/or prevalent bass
>>64693138
320 CBR, always. Why not have the best possible discernible quality with every album? The size differential is negligible.
96 kbps ought to be enough for everyone. That's what I put on my mp3 player.
>>64693985
ripped from youtube too, right? they have good compression algorithms, gives your music a nice aesthetic.
>>64693138
>being this fucking new
please refrain from posting in the future
i say we make a new movement where the music is so compressed that it's barely recognizable
hypercompression
it'll be the patrician version of vaporwave
>>64694513
Shut the up heck, kid.
>>64693138
320. I always have problems with VBR
>not using ogg
wew
>>64694475
This. That shit is so comfy
>>64697828
I was joking but you're not wrong for some stuff
Daniel Lopatin's early Eccojams videos benefited from it
>>64693821
>ALAC
cucked
>>64698169
alac is open source