General consensus on ‘Little People‘

I prefer interesting music

>>64408886
elaborate young man

>>64408871
that album is good. he got kinda boring after that

Verne Troyer>>>>>Warwick Davis>Peter Dinklage

Excruciatingly boring

>>64408918
underrated

>>64408909
this music is not interesting

>>64408923
as opposed to what?

>>64408913
Agreed. Little people makes for beautiful background music, but when placed up front and analyzed its flaws quickly unravel. Could've benefitted from far more experimentation with dynamics, rather than being a very straight forward, singular piece

>>64408958
to whom exactly? You? The collective?

Define your terms

>>64408959
>Downtempo
Anything.

>>64408975
OP here

I'll agree to that, I never imagined his work to be anything past background musik. I do enjoy it regardless.

>>64409013
if all you're gonna reply with is generalities then I'm simply going to disregard your posts as trolling and end the conversation here.

File: image.jpg (34KB, 300x275px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

34KB, 300x275px

>>64409013
>condescending to a genre he listened to much of at all
>not knowing the sonic range of downtempo
>being THIS pleb

>>64409083
Hasn't
>>64409021
Ya and at the same time that's sort of his goal so I can't knock his hustle in that sense.

>>64408871
super underwhelming honestly, got a lot of hype but I thought it was like a 6