>>64292209
The 2000s were a very awkward period in a lot of ways. Some real brilliance in there but a lot of ugliness and painful adjustments / defragmentations happening

It makes sense when you really think back to the time.

Band makes a super accessible version of an already popular genre right at the very start of a decade. They got in early and just at the right time for that environment.

>>64292209
the top selling album of the 90s was the black album by metallica, followed by mediocre pop rock, and then a shitty "post-grunge" (i.e. regurgitation of the already bland fake grunge scene that emerged after Nirvana became big) album that people praise for no reason

so the 2000s really aren't that much worse

>>64292209
I'm really glad that really dorky adolescent Banksy-ish 'street art' aesthetic is so out of style now. Just so so fucking LAAAAAAAME

>>64292436
Yeah, all the guys in Linkin Park had some kind of really intense tagging fetish.
...they probably still do.

Nu-metal is already aging exceptionally well. Except for Disturbed.num ah nah num a nah na um ergh nah

Great album.

>>64292774

>great album

>>64292956
>RYM matters
kek

>>64292956
>posts rym
thanks for proving my point

>>64292995
>>64292998

I bet your favorite albums are rated pretty highly on rym.

Linkin Park is shit.

>>64292209
>a nu-metal album was the best selling album of the 2000s

IS THIS IT?

best selling album=/ quality album

if someone considers this the best album of that decade,consider suicide