[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
My /mu/ thought on purity ring?
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /mu/ - Music

Thread replies: 43
Thread images: 6
File: image.jpg (36 KB, 640x463) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
36 KB, 640x463
My /mu/ thought on purity ring?
>>
you don't
>>
>>64291028
first album was good
2nd album was awful and might have ruined their career. Still good live
>>
>>64291028
faggy flavor of the week popshit for pitchfork to shill and immediately drop
>>
>>64291028
I like them. They're good.
>>
>>64291028
>Listened to 3 songs
>It sucked
>Forget about them
>Listen to 3 songs again
>Fuck, I knew it was shit, why did I do this again
>>
>>64291028
They're better than Chvrches.
>>
File: Album5.png (3 KB, 284x243) Image search: [Google]
Album5.png
3 KB, 284x243
>>64291028
i liked their first album. i mean its nothing groundbreaking or anything, but still their sound is unique and struck a nerve with me. i like the production work on the voice. their new album was too poppy for my taste though. some tracks are okay but in general not happy with it. i like shrines from start to finish though. consistent quality. especially the secound half is pretty good.
>>
>>64292941
fuck you chris
>>
>>64291028
Their sound already sounds stale as hell. Didn't Shrines come out in like 2012?
>>
CUT OPEN MY STERNUM AND PULL MY LITTLE RIBS AROUND YOU
>>
>>64293420
hit the nail
>>
i liked that one song on youtube where a gold man is spinning around

its pretty enjoyable
>>
>>64291028
first album is good. the music isn't anything special, but the lyrics and vocals make it really enjoyable. the lyrics specially are very unique and have their own style, very body-horror.
the second album is bland as fuq
>>
Mediocre production on first album, horrible production in all categories on second album.

Her singing's pretty good, though. I like Jon Hopkins' remixes of it.
>>
>>64292941
They're not
>>
>>64294875
i do like her voice but shes not actually a good singer
>>
>>64291058
this

I've listened over 50 times to their debut. Was completely disappointed by their debut.
>>
I really like Shrines but that second album was so forgettable. Saw them at Coachella and remembered why I liked them in the first place. Hope they get back on track with the next one.
>>
>>64295019
Lauren's voice is highly inferior to Megan's.
Chvrches is a lot more generic too.
>>
>>64295073
Yeah, I take that back. I just like the sound of her voice, not really the singing. Same with Grimes for me.
>>
>>64295267
More generic but better songwriters. The songs are simply better.
>>
>>64291028
Enjoyed their first album. Second was meh.

When I saw them in concert it was the biggest concentration of tryhards I've ever seen at a show
>>
>>64295792
>better songwriters
Factually wrong. Antything from Shrines trumps over anything CHVRCHES ever wrote. They also have way more unique, more fleshed out lyrics.
>>
Am I the only one who enjoyed the second album, Another Eternity? I thought it was really well done, as was Shrines
>>
>>64294875
>Jon Hopkins' remixes
Link?
>>
>>64293420
this

sucks that they didn't get the commercial or YA movie placement that would've made them take off. shrines is the exact opposite of everything i would assume that band was on paper. there are moments where they transcend every pitfall of bands similar to them as well as indie pop/rock as a whole.
>>
>>64296019
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CPmucPjFulI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sibXF2dhk3s
>>
>>64295926
it had too much mainstream edm influence for me. the production and her voice on the first one felt more unique compared to what was going on around them at the time. not only that, but i also feel that shrines had a much more cohesive theme to it. the second one just went a totally opposite direction of what i enjoyed in the first.
>>
>>64296081
i mean they're still getting gigs so they did take off. but they are much more deserving of arena-level acclaim.
>>
>>64295926
Another Eternity has 1-2 decent songs max. Everything else is overproduced overly bright glossy pop garbage. And the singing and lyrics are so trite and sound identical on almost every song. The melodies are extremely forgettable and non-catchy, except on those 1-2 songs (I forget which).
>>
>>64296117
Thanks my dude
>>
>>64292941
True, but that's not saying much.
>>
>>64295888
What are you talking about? All songs from Shrines sound the same. That's the biggest problem with Purity Ring. Chvrches have more variety (Lies, Tether, You Caught a Light, Science/Visions, Empty Threat, Clearest Blue, Gun, etc).
>>
>>64291028
pretty much what everyone else said. shrines = good, another eternity = hot garbage
>>
File: IMGP0408.jpg (1 MB, 2992x2992) Image search: [Google]
IMGP0408.jpg
1 MB, 2992x2992
the moment our hands came apart ive been living in the shell of the man that i was in that moment... why go on like this?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5fz_f5-dae0
>>
>>64299351
that's the gayest thing I've ever heard

Do you masturbate with that hand while thinking about her?
>>
File: IMGP0390.jpg (2 MB, 2992x2992) Image search: [Google]
IMGP0390.jpg
2 MB, 2992x2992
>>64299614
i would never taint the memory of her like that...we shared a real moment.... thats fucked up...

you are disgusting
>>
>thought another eternity was their debut album
>thought they had released a new album that was shit
>turns out /mu/ just has shit taste yet again

another eternity is fine you fucks, though I wonder if it's significantly worse than shrines considering I've never listened to it.

>>64299695
>we shared a real moment
she would never be able to pick you out of a crowd anon
>>
>>64293420
it was groundbreaking though.
>>
File: IMGP0417.jpg (1021 KB, 2992x2992) Image search: [Google]
IMGP0417.jpg
1021 KB, 2992x2992
>>64299725
she looked me in my eyes bro... dont kid yourself...
>>
>>64299351
>>64299695
>>64299812
..................................................
>>
File: taylor stare.png (195 KB, 400x356) Image search: [Google]
taylor stare.png
195 KB, 400x356
>>64299835
ur a hater
Thread replies: 43
Thread images: 6

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.