listen to a pieceit's actually a record

File: sad-costume-dog-11.jpg (177KB, 600x440px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

177KB, 600x440px

>listen to a piece
>it's actually a segment

>>64230819
>not listening to Musikalisches Werk
plebe

>listen to a piece
>its actually of shit

>>64230844
your german is horrid

>listen to a song
>it's actually a track

>listen to a hit
>it's actually a banger

>>64230819
>>64230838
>>64230919
Laugh, but in the course of thinking about my player file structure, I just unified everything. So albums consist of songs just the same way genres consist of artists and songs consist of movements. It's all nodes of the same tree.

>>64230958
In other words, from the database point of view, it is wrong to differentiate between, say, a genre and an album by purported virtue of the fact that the latter doesn't have a publisher and the latter doesn't have, say, associated cultural movements -- instead, both fields should exist in the data structure and just be null when needed.

>listen to a tune
>it's actually a dittie

>>64230983
>>64230958
way to kill the thread, nerdstein

File: 1461097925846.png (403KB, 512x512px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

403KB, 512x512px

>listen to a piece
>it's actually a movement

>>64230864
donkuh shurn

>>64230852
chuckled

>listen to an album
>it's actually a jam