>>64203885

Creative types are usually more sensitive people that find solace in things that make them temporarily feel great to escape their surroundings, like drugs.
So yes.

not necessarily. Not legit. We don't even know our favorite artists truly personally, do we?

>muh troubled genius

No, just the dumb ones. Sometimes beer is more readily available to artists than water, but that doesn't mean you have to fucking drink it. The ones with substance abuse issues are the ones that go into it with this image of what it is to be a rock star, something they most likely have only seen portrayed in the media their entire lives.

I always just assumed it was because they had money. Youth+wealth=drug abuse

>>64204036
seems to be a true stereotype, if you look at musicians

Lauren Mayberry is an ugly sheltered dumbass who depends on makeup and and beta fanbase. Also check em.

>>64204087
>check em
No dubs = your post is untrue.

I'd just say celebs in general are more prone to it.

>>64203885
She looks so wasted.

Not really. Actually, alcoholics and drug addicts are more prone tu substance abuse.

>>64204202
but it is true anon, it is true!