/mu/core applications
We need to push some new albums to freshen up /mu/core. Please keep to this format.
>Album title
>Artist/Band name
>Year of release
>Two or three sentences explaining why.
Obligatory, does not need an explanation
Pinkerton
Weezer
1997-ish
It's sub mu core but it belongs more than Hospice for sure
Funeral
Arcade Fire
2004
Universal acclaim, defining indie rock of the early 2000's
>>64164674
came to post this
+1
matthew
kool keith
2000
it reveals the truth about the music industry
Old Boots, New Dirt by Jason Aldean
Long Season by Fishmans
>>64164656
Why does it matter what is called /mu/core?
Do you base your library and listening habits around what /mu/ puts on a chart or something?
Old Boots New Dirt
Jason Aldean
2014
Pretty much defied every known convention of the country genre and incorporated various elements and influences from an eclectic selection of music from around the world. Impossible to categorize as it's simply one of a kind and changed the definition of "country" music forever.
Pushing individual taste is what caused Untrue and STG,STV to be labelled "/mu/core" even though they were never discussed enough to be eligible.
This one definitely
First Utterance
Comus
1971
Often considered RYMcore, but it has seen so much posting that it has managed to expand out of /daily/ or /rym/ circlejerks and into the public eye. I often see this posted in "post your favorite album" threads.
>>64164656
All of those are good albums, but they don't come close to
Oasis
Defiantly Maybe
1994
Because it is a very solid debut of the 1990s and people need to learn to love Oasis
>>64166941
>Defiantly
Why are people posting albums they find good... The idea of /mu/core is that it's very popular on /mu/, nothing else.
>>64164981
>>64166667
>>64164674
>>64166733
>>64166843
these all qualify
>>64164656
I see MPP on all of these /mu/core albums but it seems /mu/ itself hates it
eventhoimoit'soneofthebestalbumsofalltimeifnotthebestalbum
>>64166941
its not pretentious enough tho
