ITT draw a musician and others guess who it is
>>64096816
Too easy, Grimes
>>64096826
It doesn't look like Grimes
>>64096816
That's obviously Grimes
You will never look that good
>>64096816
Grimes
Ugh she's nasty
>>64096948
Blixa
>>64096954
Is that you?
>>64096826
>>64096904
>>64096952
>>64096954
Correct
>>64096997
Wrong
>>64096816
>>64096954
why are grimes haters so nasty?
i don't love her but come on, you got some real problems
that's now Grimes DELETE this picture or i dont know WHAT IM GONNA FUCK(GING DO
>>64097011
she's ugly and makes horrible music now, yet people obsess over her. this atrocious grimes-loving meme deserves all the shit it receives.
>>64096816
Looks more like Prince
>>64097033
>makes horrible music now
that's just your opinion man. there's a difference between being critical and straight up aggressive
>>64097131
Moe Zart.
>>64097078
bad taste warrants aggressiveness
>>64096972
Yeah
>>64097146
Correct
>>64097146
what does this say about races of people
>>64097157
Nothing, really, since races no longer have specific tastes
>>64097033
If her music is horrible as you said, explain the very positive reviews of her albums.
>>64097146
>bad taste warrants aggressiveness
That is plain bullshit. You're aggressive because you're afraid to like her music. I bet you never gave her albums a fair chance.
>>64096816
>>64096997
Jesus christ, OP, these are actually really good. You've got a good hand.Would it be weird if I asked you to draw a picture of me in this style? I dig it very much so.
>>64097182
it's nu-hipster poptimist propaganda followed by the gullible morons who were tricked into thinking bad music = good.
>>64097033
not everyone finds her ugly, tripfag
>>64097249
yeah, i know, but i do.
>>64097249
everyone with at least decent taste in women do.
>>64097206
Actually I kind of like her first album, but I hate the fact that people like HER as a person, which is not only legitimate, but the only stance anyone should have.
>>64097249
Thanks for spelling out what's wrong with the world.
>>64097236
I'm afraid that you're the gullible moron. You must be brainwashed. There are different critics, and most of them said very positive things about her work. Do you actually believe that all of them are part of a propaganda? If yes, how can you prove this shit? Or you're just talking out of your ass?
Julie andrews
>>64097236
By the way, explain what are your criteria for good and bad music. How can you prove that a certain album is good or bad? And no, "I think that" is not an argument.
>>64097143
Nice drawing, Will.
>>64097236
I'd say you are right but you are a weeaboo so you should kys
>>64097193
mac demarco
>>64097426
Goblin Mayberry
>>64097426
chvrches
>>64097228
daniel johnston
>>64097299
i don't think it's unreasonable to suspect that many music publications give favorable ratings to more accessible, even lowest-common-denominator music likes grime's most recent work in order to seem more inclusive and less "snobbish" to the general public.
that's the propaganda bit, and it's not even the worst part.
what's worse is all the aforementioned gullible morons who are suckered into thinking eclectic taste involving shitty pop music is what's good. and it has gotten to the point that it's a self-sustaining echo-chamber for these second wave, image-obsessed, gullible hipster faggots.
>>64097323
i don't really want to get into a "yes" "no" fight, so i'll pass, but thanks.
>>64097432
b-but anon-sama...
>>64097426
Debbie Harry?
>>64097444
>>64097450
correct!
>>64097426
looks like she's about to fart loudly
>>64097565
that's Lavren for ya
Shitty/10
>>64097478
You're stupid. You can't understand why people like music that you don't like. Those music publications gave favorable ratings to her music because they thought it was great, not because your non-verifiable bullshit propaganda. You can't prove what you said, so I'm assuming it's just trolling/baiting.
>>64097642
You can't disprove either
(Ma's Ter tr Oll)
>>64097642
i understand why a person would like it (and it's fine if they do!) i just don't like the people who are deluding themselves, saying they have good or higher-brow taste while enjoying what's nothing more than poor pop music.
i imagine the rise of poptimism must be quite a relief to the first wave of hipsters who were pretending to like things that didn't actually appeal to them. poptimism gives them the ability to actually listen to what they enjoy.
we can only hope that the next movement for the hipster crowd is that they fully merge with the mainstream once again and forget that they ever tried to pretend they had good taste in the first place.
>>64097750
sandor clegane
>>64097753
Except it's not "poor pop music". This is properly awesome pop music. These people aren't deluding themselves, they're actually enjoy listening to her songs. I don't know what kind of shit you're listening if you think her music is bad. Maybe even hate all pop...
>>64097802
Aha, you're a hipster. You only listen to stuff that seems cool ("good taste"), without really enjoying it. You're a poser, just like I thought.
>>64097033
>>64097236
These
im not artistically gifted but this is all off memory
>>64097991
Ty segall
>>64097824
i believe art angels poor. there's nothing gripping or interesting about it.
i love a good pop song. one of my favorite albums ever is sugar babe's songs.
>>64097856
yup ur right anon good job
>>64098012
Haha no, but it does look more like him than my guy
>>64098026
>i believe art angels poor. there's nothing gripping or interesting about it.
But for fuck sake, Art Angels is catchy as hell. If you like pop it's impossible to not like it.
>>64098061
i don't find it catchy, i find it grating. what i really mean i guess is there's no remarkable difference between art angels and generic top 40 fodder. if you like that top 40 sound art angels will appeal to you, if you don't, art angels won't satisfy. but that doesn't mean i can't like good pop music.
and if you like art angels more power to you, enjoy the hell out of it.
like i say, just don't pretend it's something it's not.
>>64097824
Why don't you listen to better pop music?
There's so much out there that improves on every aspect of Grimes' work, and yet you still listen to her without being aware of how much interesting pop music exists.
Art Angels is pretty much exactly the same as all the radio pop music that's on right now, the only real difference is the obnoxious weaboo-tier rap and Grimes' image itself, which makes it okay for Pitchfork to pretend like everything she does is a masterpiece.
I've never seen a single person on RYM or last.fm that listened to Grimes that had any taste of their own, every single person just listened to pitchfork approved music. I don't have any respect for Grimes herself or any of her fans.
>>64098061
I personally found it unpleasant, her voice and the obnoxious production style makes it an even more dreadful listen than the average overplayed pop song.
Go listen to a more interesting pop artist like Julia Holter, and you might realize how weak of an album Art Angels was.
>>64098122
>Why don't you listen to better pop music?
Like what?
>Art Angels is pretty much exactly the same as all the radio pop music that's on right now, the only real difference is the obnoxious weaboo-tier rap and Grimes' image itself, which makes it okay for Pitchfork to pretend like everything she does is a masterpiece.
I don't think you listened to radio pop. There's literally nothing like Art Angels on the radio. Where are the similar songs to Kill V. Maim, for instance?
>Go listen to a more interesting pop artist like Julia Holter, and you might realize how weak of an album Art Angels was.
I know Julia Holter. But come on, she's not really pop. She's pretty boring to be honest.
>>64098061
>objectivism
Based retard.
It's a bin of recycled alternate universe early 2000's top 40's hits remixed and over dubbed relentlessly with some screaming, Alvin and the Chipmunks sounding weeb on the vox.
The absolute worst album I listened to all last year.
>>64096997
Yorkie
>>64098210
You just don't get it because you are too limited intellectually. I'm sure the crappy music that you enjoy is obnoxious. Are you a Swans fan by chance?
>>64098201
>>64098061
>>64097856
>>64097824
>>64097642
>>64097299
>>64097249
>>64097182
>>64098256
>STOP DISLIKING ASTROTURFED INDIE WAIFU POP I LIKE WAHHH
Holy autism. People are allowed to have different opinions, you fucking sperg. Are you aware that this is a music forum?
>>64097991
rdj
>>64098305
Stop being a butthurt autist. It's a music forum but your shitty opinions deserve to be proved how hollow they are.
>>64098201
I mean there's plenty of far superior dream pop, you could listen to Cocteau Twins since Grimes made a (failed) attempt in copying Fraser's voice.
As for Art Angels, it's nothing more than corny synthpop revival. I'm sure you would hate the new shitty M83 album if you listened to it, purely because it doesn't have Grimes' disgusting "muh hipster feminist random girl" image attached to it.
>>64097991
aphex twin?
>>64098201
>>64098061
>>64097856
>>64097824
>>64097642
>>64097299
>>64097249
>>64097182
>>64098256
Someone explain to me why literally every grimesfag is like this.
>>64098420
Not that guy but everyone here is allowed to shit on anything for any reason they want. I don't know if you've realized off your dose of Ritalin, but people communicate in ways outside of a manner you deem acceptable.
Why do I even have to explain this?
You're so obviously a low-functioning adult aspie that has never seen a vagina and becomes infatuated with dogshit bubblegum popstars with the slightest air of femininity. It's embarrassing and pathetic as fuck. Please stop.
hi
is this the grimes general
>>64098569
No
This is a cringe thread.
>>64098482
I like Cocteau Twins, but they're guitar based. Grimes does her own synthy dreampop thing, and she does it very well.
I kind of like the new M83, but not as much as their previous albums. By the way, what is good NEW synthpop to you, if Art Angels is "corny synthpop revival"?
>>64096997
nice style, and i can obviously tell it's thom, but it doesn't actually look like him
>>64098534
>Someone explain to me why literally every grimesfag is like this.
Because they're right. You can't prove objectively that Grimes makes bad music. Prove me wrong right now. I'm willing to listen.
>>64097598
avey
don't even trying
>>64098122
>art angels is the only grimes album
Just trying.
>>64098534
>You're so obviously a low-functioning adult aspie that has never seen a vagina and becomes infatuated with dogshit bubblegum popstars with the slightest air of femininity. It's embarrassing and pathetic as fuck. Please stop.
Did I talk about her appearance or about her music? You obviously must be a dumb faggot that project too much. Please stop projecting that stuff. I'm not interested.
>>64098605
Shaking The Habitual was the last listenable synthpop revival album I've heard, and calling it synthpop revival would not be entirely correct to begin with.
>>64098633
Nobody can prove that an artist makes bad music because music is subjective, but Grimes makes unoriginal and overproduced pop music.
>>64098661
Geidi Primes is actually decent and Halfaxa is far from the worst thing ever, but people who actually care about her music only listen to AA and Visions which are both terrible.
The two aforementioned albums I complimented are good because they have a much more original sound that's much more abrasive and interesting than anything that followed.
>>64098658
Elliott smith
Made a bunch for you plebs to guess
>>64098699
donald trump
>>64098713
Except that STH is not synthpop. Anything else?
>Geidi Primes is actually decent and Halfaxa is far from the worst thing ever, but people who actually care about her music only listen to AA and Visions which are both terrible.
Weird opinion. I'm pretty sure you just don't like catchy songs (coincidence: both Visions and Art Angels are catchy). What means pop to you is different to what it means to normal people.
>>64098736
Big bird obi one can no be and ralph the serial cofeemaker
>>64098736
Buckethead - left
>>64098788
Alright then, if the Knife's late material doesn't count then I hate synthpop revival. It's led to nothing other than uninteresting music for "hip" music publications to endlessly praise, just like the post-punk revival.
>>64098633
>You can't prove objectively that Grimes makes bad music. Prove me wrong right now. I'm willing to listen.
I imagine it has something to do with objectivity in music not existing.
Care to prove how she's objectively good?
>>64098703
>Did I talk about her appearance or about her music?
You didn't have to. You've been sperging the fuck out this entire thread over a random trip not having the same opinion on p4k astroturf indie waifu pop.
See
>Someone explain to me why literally every grimesfag is like this.
>>64098825
that is fucking horrifying
>>64098825
bork
>>64098736
I really like your drawings how do I draw like that if I have absolutely no talent at all
>>64098823
That explain your Grimes hate. But do you like the original synthpop of the 1980s?
>>64098825
Aretha diana oprah phil act on my girls
>>64098858
Not really. It's aged very poorly and none of it was particularly interesting to begin with. Kraftwerk is an incredible band at the very least, but I hate early Talk Talk, New Order, and Depeche Mode.
I actually like Deep Cuts and Silent Shout too, mainly because they have a more interesting sound for synthpop albums, but even then I think they are much weaker than STH.
>>64098845
>Care to prove how she's objectively good?
No. Because it's subjective. Basically it's pointless to argue if she's good or not. Hence all comments about her music being shit belong to trash. At least the positive comments are based on the general opinion about her, which is positive.
>>64098795
good guess
>>64098802
Yup! but that one's the easiest.
>>64098854
Practice makes perfect, try some tutorials. Or you can emulate other peoples style, but thats if you want to get popular on tumblr
>>64098860
I almost drew him then I recognized those teeth
>>64098956
Wow, you must be a fucking retard if you typed that up without realizing how stupid you sound.
>Basically it's pointless to argue if she's good or not
It's impossible to prove objective value of music (for the most part) but that doesn't mean people can't hold varying opinions and argue about it.
>Hence all comments about her music being shit belong to trash
If comments that express someone's negative opinion about an artist are worthless, then so are positive ones by the very same logic. And thus we would never be able to discuss anything music-related. I have no idea how anyone with a functioning brain could have thought this was a reasonable statement.
> At least the positive comments are based on the general opinion about her, which is positive
So the positive opinions on her have merit because they are in line with the taste of other people (also built on subjectivity)? That doesn't even make sense you fucking idiot, those opinions have no more value than the harshly negative ones.
>>64098718
No, it's wrong
please don't turn this into a grimes thread, it's obvious that she sucks, and the drawings are funny
>>64098956
>At least the positive comments are based on the general opinion about her, which is positive.
you went full retard
>>64099322
You are retard. The general opinion about her is positive. Deal with it.
>>64098825
>ywn be bjork's lifelong soulmate
>ywn have amazing intimate sex with her that she will write songs about
>ywn get bjork to lay her head on your chest when she's tired
i have problems
>>64097236
I was gonna say you were absolutely correct but then I saw the anime pic. Now I'm gonna have to agree with the ones you're debating against. Thanks a lot.
>>64099298
> please don't turn this into a grimes thread
> start thread with grimes picture
Lol
>>64099354
It's "retarded".
Yes the general is positive, but >>64099046 is right about you being an incoherent faggot.
Deal with it, faggot.
>>64099425
>>64099298
Nick Drake?
>>64099690
yes
>>64099772
:)
>>64098609
Yeah it ended up looking like some other smug bastard.
>>64097208
I wouldn't mind, but you probably wouldn't recognize yourself and I'm going to a party right now. Hit me up some other time or on last.fm.
>>64099915
C Lo Green?
>>64098658
david foster wallace
>>64098736
Buckethead, Thom Yorke and dunno.
>>64101442
Yes. Very close, Damon Albarn, but it does look a lot like Thom. No one is going to get 3, its Chuck Person aka. Oneohtrix Point Never
>>64096816
Someone draw Jess Abbott pls
>tfw no qt indie lesbian gf
>>64097856
I don't like her music, plain and simple. I can't get into it.
And her fans, like you make me hate her more.
Also, it's obvious she doesn't give a fuck about her looks, which is why she's such a great target. Why should you?
>>64102032
I don't care if you like or not her music. Just stop saying shit about her.
>>64102113
>>64102277
I will saying literally anything I want to, fuckass. Consider suicide if you have a problem with it, you hypersensitive faggot.
>>64102113
Make me
Oh wait
>>64102448
The "Blade"
>>64102113
>I don't agree with your opinion therefore censor it.
>>64102113
She ugly
>>64098736
Middle one is Damon Albarn
>>64102113
Grimes' music sucks ass and she's a shitty person and you should feel bad for liking her
>>64102757
bird up
>>64102757
Our boy Gylve the metal man of zero cut-and-paste trickery.
Sit well, metal man.
>>64097193
Wiki
Did these a while ago. Some of them aren't that accurate...
>>64101040
Rich Homie Quan
Nice drawing
>>64103179
Grimes, idk, Gira
Thom yorke, Drake, Sufjan
Balance, RDJ, Mangum
>>64103179
-
Panda Bear
Michael Gira
Thom Yorke
-
Sufjan Stevens
Father John Misty
Aphex Twin
Jeff Mangum
>>64097011
I personally dont like her because of her outspoken feminist persona and her hypocritical arrogance. We liked when she made good music and her off-kilter looks were kind of cute. But then i realized how she was kind of just dumb and wanted to make top40 radio music... so her kind of outspoken anti-men and anti-music indestry stance put me off. Like she has the gall to say all that when she isnt that great of an artist and pretty bad looking. We didnt address it before when she was nice, but now that she is insufferable why not call her out on her ugly qualities?
>>64104356
nope x yes
yes yes yes
nope yes yes
>>64104627
x yes! yes (surprised you got panda)
yes x yes
yes yes yes
the first one is supposed to be brian wilson btw
>>64105059
That panda is pretty nice, man. It wasn't hard.
>>64103007
no you pleb fuck
the person on a blaze in the northern sky's album cover is zephyrous
>>64097236
ayo u ever jerk off to the though of sticking it in her bum?
