10/10 albums
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /mu/ - Music
You are currently reading a thread in /mu/ - Music
10/10 albums
>>64052856
not that
pic not related
>>64052856
I'm not a big fan, but I agree. it's a flawless album
>>64052856
you first op xD
ITAOTS
>>64052877
what is money
![kr43-The-Depreciation-Guild-In-Her-Gentle-Jaws[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/YpbKlNk.jpg "kr43-The-Depreciation-Guild-In-Her-Gentle-Jaws[1].jpg")
>>64052896
What's wrong with it?
>>64052877
It's flawless in its instrumental wankery and guitar noodeling, yes.
>>64052877
>it's a flawless album
Money.
>>64052912
not a bad song by itself but it doesn't fit with the rest of the songs on the album
>>64052921
>>64052912
>>64052917
"I Don't Like It" isn't a flaw
>>64052934
How so? It fits in as it discusses a flaw in humanity: greed
>>64052934
Really? I thought it fitted in with the album's theme perfectly.
>>64052896
I thought money was an excellent song.
>>64052856
>>64053062
>mixing errors are not flaws
>>64053108
>treefingers
>>64052904
>>64053108
Both very good.
>>64053116
Can we have some original posts and not just repeats of what someone else liked?
https://youtu.be/yundAnnvwxY
https://youtu.be/uMgr2yH6v8I
https://youtu.be/xzFLKperju4
https://youtu.be/zFPF-Z3ANBw
https://youtu.be/sIEVnmUxbDI
https://youtu.be/AxM_sgMM2rQ
https://youtu.be/gl9z-9UAMCE
https://youtu.be/9uKCd80i6HY
https://youtu.be/Gupjrl5ZSX0
>>64053088
Pleb
>>64053237
>Can we have some original posts and not just repeats of what someone else liked?
>>64052904
>>64052904
>>64052904
>>64053239
There is literally a mistake in the album, so it cannot be a perfect 10/10
>>64053280
>implying there is a set ranking that everybody should follow.
>>64052961
>>64052975
>>64052979
Money is a good song, but it's not as good as the others. And it doesn't fit. It may in terms of the lyrics being appropriate for the theme of the album but not at all musically.
And remember that we're discussing the song in the context of someone claiming that the album is flawless. Well then every song has to be flawless and Money certainly is not.
>>64053280
Also i don't even know where you got a mixing error from.
>>64053310
>but not at all musically.
How so?
>Well then every song has to be flawless and Money certainly is not.
Then what's the flaw? "It doesn't fit!" can't be the flaw because now you are dissecting each song individually.
>>64053241
>third world memes
>>64053338
>he can't hear the mixing error
Who's calling who a pleb?
>>64053309
>a mistake is fine if you lower your standards
I'm sure your boss says you do great work
>>64053356
What meme? I just told you a flaw.
>>64053371
Please show me where the mixing error is at.
Also give me your example of a 10/10 album. Its like you can't except that different people have different rankings.
>>64053414
>Please show me where the mixing error is at
The drop out in Like a Rolling Stone.
>Its like you can't except that different people have different rankings
Why bother posting if you just run and hide behind a shield of subjectivity?
>>64053427
What dropout? Also im guessing you don't have a single 10/10 album.
Also music is subjective not objective.
>>64053486
>What dropout?
Haven't you listened to it?
>Also music is subjective not objective.
Incorrect.
>>64053498
There is only a little of objectiveness in music the rest is all subjective. If you think that music is objective than you are obviously a giant pleb.
And like a rolling stone is possibly my most listened to song so i you managed to find a dropout than you must be incredibly said to nitpick the most smallest fucking mistakes because it has to be incredibly tiny.
>>64053498
sad*
>>64053544
>There is only a little of objectiveness in music
Then it isn't subjective, is it?
>If you think that music is objective than you are obviously a giant pleb
Hz and dB are objective. I don't suppose you know what those mean, do you "patrician"?
>And like a rolling stone is possibly my most listened to song so i you managed to find a dropout than you must be incredibly said to nitpick the most smallest fucking mistakes because it has to be incredibly tiny.
Dat damage control.
>>64053610
Philosophically, everything you perceive is subjective
>>64052896
It's a hit
>>64053691
Not if it can be scientifically measured.
Nice try though.
>>64053610
Do you even know what subjective and objective means?
>>64053108
I actually agree. It's hard to find albums as perfectly made as this one.
>>64053738
What makes you think I don't?
>>64052856
You say Lady Gaga, I say Pink Floyd
You say Miley Cyrus, I say Queen
You say T-Pain, I say AC/DC
You say Jonas Brother, I say Linkin Park
You say Jeniffer Lopez, I say Green Day
You say Justin Bieber, I punch you in the face
92% of teens prefer pop and hip-hop.If you are part of the 8% that still listens to real music, copy and paste this message to your signature. P.S I am one of the 8% of teens that
>>64053745
So telll me, how can I scientifically measure music?
>>64053715
Every scientific theory comes down to observable laws about the universe. Observation = Perception
>>64053764
>Then it isn't subjective, is it?
Then what is it? If theres more subjectiveness in music that means that its subjective not objective.
>>64053863
>>64053836
Music is simply variations in air pressure, which is measurable.
That is objective.
Any other questions? Or can you continue to post albums you think are 10s but then I can identify flaws preventing them from being 10s?
>>64053790
>>64053926
Still haven't given me your 10.
>>64053947
I'm not an enabler
>>64053967
So you came on this thread to shit on somebodies opinion without sharing your own?
You sound like a brilliant lad.
>>64054018
But that's what you are doing.
>>64053341
>How so?
Dark Side of the Moon seems ethereal, slow and smooth to me. Money is none of those things.
It's a funky song with a hard rock solo. It sounds very fast when compared to the rest of the album. Even the vocals stick out like a sore thumb.
>Then what's the flaw?
I don't think of Money as having any serious, glaring flaws. But are you actually claiming that it's a flawless song? If you tell us that you genuinely think it is a perfect song then I'll take that up with you as I'm sure most people here would.
>"It doesn't fit!" can't be the flaw because now you are dissecting each song individually.
>"It doesn't fit!"
Hmm... that's condescending. I like your style.
>>64053945
Something as stupid as I.The Sun fading at the end makes it a 9.999999999999 for me
>>64053062
>out of tune guitar
Get out of the way for an actually perfect album
>>64053779
>92% of teens prefer pop and hip-hop.If you are part of the 8% that still listens to real music, copy and paste this message to your signature. P.S I am one of the 8% of teens that
>signature
signature... where is that from again? that sounds so familiar
>>64054055
Are you actually retarded or are you baiting?
>>64054118
>Dark Side of the Moon seems ethereal, slow and smooth to me
>Money is none of those things.
So you have an incorrect perception of the album, if you are blatantly ignoring a characteristic of it.
>It's a funky song with a hard rock solo. It sounds very fast when compared to the rest of the album
Variety is the spice of life, no?
>I don't think of Money as having any serious, glaring flaws
Then we agree there's no flaws. It's a 10/10 album.
>But are you actually claiming that it's a flawless song?
If there are no flaws, it must be. Do you not know what flawless means?
>>64054125
I love that part. The fade into white noise, with II. picking up with more white noise but shifting it to sound like a beach/waves is one of the highlights of the album for me. I envision that part as Phil washing up on a beach before his trek up mount eerie.
Joni Mitchell - Blue
Dont even dare to disagree you fucking retarded faggot cucks
>>64054161
You waltzed into the thread and said my opinion that the album had glaring faults was wrong.
Also
>Music is subjective
>but your opinion is wrong and mine is right
Nice.
>>64052856
OP did you mean to post this?
Red ~ King Crimson
Revolver ~ Beatles
MBDTF ~ Yeezy
>>64052896
I think money is a fine song if you listen to it on Vinyl. Its the start of side 2, so it's not as jarring as if you listen to it digitally or on a cd or something. This is sort of lost in this day and age, however.
>>64054207
>Revolver ~ Beatles
There are MANY errors on this album. It can't be a 10
>>64054207
>MBDTF ~ Yeezy
It has a DR4
>>64053715
You cant scientifically measure how good music is.
>>64054173
the taste of a redditor combined with the argumentative arrogance of a /mu/tant
you're such a strange little creature
>>64054207
>MBDTF ~ Yeezy
>10/10 album that has Nicki Minaj and Kid Cudi
lad...
>>64052856
>>64054287
Correct because how we perceive music is subjective.
Yet music itself is objective.
>>64054128
>part of his creative genius pleb
>>64054293
Shit nigga you don't even try to pretend like you know anything about those two artists
>>64054293
>hating on kid Cudi
Minaj I can understand but Cudi?
>>64054355
>i was only pretending to be retarded
>>64054184
Okay no I'm sorry I meant to refer to the fade-out at the end of II. Solar System. I fucking love the fade into white noise and the transition from I to II, I could never criticise it.
Dark Side of the Moon is literally a perfect album. I've tried denying it myself over the years. But I can't hide from the truth. It's okay to like a really good dadrock album.
>>64054188
>Dont even dare to disagree you fucking retarded faggot cucks
Add pleb somewhere and you have /mu/ in a quote
>>64054427
Oh yeah that is a kind of silly idea considering that the songs flawlessly flow into each other if there's no fade. I suppose it never really bothered me because I'm so in love with the rest of the album haha.
>>64054173
>So you have an incorrect perception of the album, if you are blatantly ignoring a characteristic of it.
By that logic a song could never be out of place.
>Then we agree there's no flaws. It's a 10/10 album.
I said it doesn't have any glaring flaws. If that means perfection to you then we have very different understandings of what those words mean.
>If there are no flaws, it must be. Do you not know what flawless means?
I didn't say it has no flaws. I asked you whether or not you think it's flawless which you didn't seem to want to answer directly. Do you think it's a perfect, flawless song?
You're responding to me as if I said "Money fucking sucks... worst song I've ever heard". All I've said is that it doesn't fit the album and that it's not perfect. Many people agree with me about the former and virtually everyone would agree with me about the latter.
>>64054318
Okay so you are making up a disscusion based on the ambiguity of the way you expose your point (music is objective)
Wow, one would think that you just like people to think you are retarded
>>64054484
>poor mixing
>wrong mixes on the master.
>>64054532
>By that logic a song could never be out of place.
How so?
>If that means perfection to you then we have very different understandings of what those words mean.
No, I'm saying there are no flaws at all (you have yet to prove otherwise). PRO-TIP: a song not fitting in your carefully-crafted paradigm of reality isn't a flaw. The flaw is actually in you.
>I asked you whether or not you think it's flawless which you didn't seem to want to answer directly
Did you read the thread? I already stated my opinion.
>All I've said is that it doesn't fit the album
Which I already retorted that it thematically fits it. Did you not read the lyrics?
>Many people agree with me about the former and virtually everyone would agree with me about the latter.
Where? People you cherypicked here or everyone else in the world who think this is a perfect album?
>>64054476
DO YOU SEE DO YOU SEE WHAT HAPPENS?
>>64054558
>I can't follow a discussion
>somehow that's his fault!
Mingus Mingus
>>64053945
This album is one of the most tremendous experiences new millennium music has ever provided for me.
>>64054484
The correct Bobby Dylan answer.
>>64054636
If you can't see that you stated your point poorly then you have a lot to learn about argumentation and you need to improve your communication skills
>>64054692
Except I stated directly that music was objective. Please keep up.
Solar Fields - Leaving Home
Modest Mouse - The Moon and Antarctica
Vibrasphere - Exploring the Tributaries
Death Cab for Cutie - Plans
Most of the Ghost in the Shell soundtracks
>>64052856
How i hate when people start threads with unrelated pics.
>>64054484
>cover photo is literally out of focus
9.8 at best.
>>64054617
Wrong mixes on the master? Elaborate
confield
>>64054484
>musicians under rehearsed and didn't know the correct ending to songs
>side D is too short
>>64054737
Yes, you did, but you should have especified from the very beggining that you were not referring to "the way we percieve music", because the term "music" is almost always tossed around here meaning that, and you definitively shouldn't have taken that many responses to realize you had provoked a misunderstanding in your interlocutor.
>>64053341
>>64054173
>>64054617
this fucking guy
>>64054617
>>64054817
>album was recalled and 4th Time Around was remixed because it was flawed
>wrong mixes of I Want You, Sad Eyed Lady, etc.
There are more. It's a very flawed album, and can't be a 10
>>64054859
>you should say what I want you to say!
OK
>>64054872
Nice argument
>>>/youtubecomments/
>>64054617
>PRO-TIP: a song not fitting in your carefully-crafted paradigm of reality isn't a flaw. The flaw is actually in you.
>>64054946
>you should say what I want you to say!
No, you should communicate correctly to avoid confusion. If this is too hard for you don't even bother to post, k?
>>64055013
>you should communicate correctly
"Music is objective"
Seems pretty obvious to me.
>>64054946
wait wait wait
do you think that dsotm is better than blonde on blonde?
>>64055052
Well I was able to list numerous flaws with BoB
No one was able to list any with DSOTM
>>64055046
I already explained to you why it could lead and actually led to confusion.
I'm not going to bother with you anymore, just continue to make a fool of yourself
>>64052856
so true.
On the metal side of things, there's pic related.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iA7v9bPaaUg
>>64055109
>I already explained to you why it could lead and actually led to confusion.
It is literally not my fault if you don't know the difference between music perception and music itself.
Go read a book you dummy.
>>64052896
>>64052921
is this a meme or something? why this of all tracks?
>>64055091
it's funny how you always stop short of actually stating your opinion plainly
that would suggest that you know you're full of shit
and there are people in this thread who have cited flaws with dsotm to which you basically replied "duuuude... the flaws are within your paradigm of thinking"
i can do that too:
>any issue you have with blonde on blonde is ultimately a result of your own stupidity
>>64055172
it is routinely cited as the worst song on dsotm and one that does not fit
>>64055151
Lol same dude as album cover thread? Or is Crush Fetish finally getting the recognition they deserve
>>64055183
>that would suggest that you know you're full of shit
Or rather see >>64053967
>and there are people in this thread who have cited flaws with dsotm
None yet. Someone didn't read the lyrics and didn't know it thematically fit, and another guy only liked the mellow songs (and forgot the bombastic crescendos of Us & Them and Eclipse... Not to mention Time and On The Run are as uptempo as Money anyways, making his point moot).
>i can do that too:
>>any issue you have with blonde on blonde is ultimately a result of your own stupidity
Except the album was continually recalled and songs were "fixed". That is indicative of a sloppy and mistake-ridden release. Objectively.
>>64055226
By one guy in this thread.
The rest of the world thinks it's a perfect album and one of their best songs.
>>64052856
>>64052904
>>64053055
>>64053062
>>64053108
>>64053146
>>64053207
>>64053442
>>64053790
>>64053945
>>64054297
>>64054551
Plebs
>>64054651
Agree on this and Kind of Blue.
>pic related
Well if we're just gonna keep making this thread, I'm just gonna keep posting the same albums.
>>64055318
>produced by Rick Rubin
dark side of the moon might not even be the third best pink floyd album
the fuck is going on with this thread... were the reddit infiltration memes true?
>>64053926
Being so stubborn makes you look stupid anon.
Music is subjective to taste and experiences. You will never play a song exactly the same as the last time.
Technically the recordings will have variances too that amps and speakers screw up, so you'll never hear exactly the same thing.
Wanna get technical, fine.
Pink Floyd fans are the Bernie Sanders supporters of music. And I say that as someone who really likes both.
>>64055420
>Being so stubborn makes you look stupid anon.
Kind of like "Music is subjective! If you say otherwise, you are wrong!!!!'
Everything else you said was a non sequitur
>>64055445
They are both pretty cool people?
>>64054617
>PRO-TIP: a song not fitting in your carefully-crafted paradigm of reality isn't a flaw. The flaw is actually in you.
SERIOUS meme potential here
just think of how many situations you could use it in
>>64055482
first day on /mu/?
>>64055588
No days leaving your mother's basement?
>>64052896
that song is perfect.
>>64052896
This. It's a good song I think but boy does it not fit with the atmosphere and vibe of the rest of the album. It just reeks of having been placed in there just to be sure the album would have a hit single.
>>64055781
>it not fit with the atmosphere and vibe of the rest of the album
How so?
>It just reeks of having been placed in there just to be sure the album would have a hit single.
The band was performing rough cuts of the album in it's entirety before they even made the album in the studio. Guess what? Money was there. It was always meant to be there.
>>64055781
>It just reeks of having been placed in there just to be sure the album would have a hit single.
>>64054310
I think Planet caravan is too slow on this
>>64055848
>The band was performing rough cuts of the album in it's entirety before they even made the album in the studio. Guess what? Money was there. It was always meant to be there.
that means nothing dipshit
you have no idea what the song was like as a rough cut
>>64055920
>that means nothing dipshit
It means as much as "I don't like it, it must have been put there to sell the album!"
>you have no idea what the song was like as a rough cut
Except for the bootlegs of early live versions, rehearsals and demos.
But by all means keep speaking like you know what you are talking about.
>>64052878
wtf is this, sounds noice
>hordes defending Money as if it was Sad-Eyed Lady of the Lowlands
This is it, guys. The infiltration is complete and we are now completely surrounded.
This is the final stand!
>>64054778
mah nig
>>64056084
>a different opinion than mine!?
>then he must be from reddit!
When will this meme end?
>>64054617
>PRO-TIP: a song not fitting in your carefully-crafted paradigm of reality isn't a flaw. The flaw is actually in you.
hahahahaha holy shit. please tell me you're still in this thread. i would love to hear more on that
>>64056117
Never. It is as old as the human race.
>>64056207
>please tell me you're still in this thread. i would love to hear more on that
What do you want to know?
This is probably the worst thread I've seen on this board in a long time. Why do I share a board with people like this
>>64054310
>Not Vol 4
fucking kek
>>64056291
I know what you mean
>this sucks because I don't like it and it doesn't fit on the album
Top pleb
This tho
>>64055151
wait i've seen an album cover where the band is called "crush fish" not "crush fetish" wtf is happening
>>64056231
I REMEMBER U WAS CONFLICTED
MISUSING UR INFUENCE
WE WUZ KANGZ N SHIT
>>64054202
they could have released Love Song for Dead Che alone and it would be a 10/10
>>64056273
fantastic! thank you
honestly i want to hear anything you have to say. anything that is similar to the sentence i quoted
>how could people who do not properly appreciate 'money' correct their carefully-crafted paradigms?
>where did the paradigms come from?
>why are the paradigms so carefully-crafted?
>who crafted them?
>do you think it has anything to do with capitalism?
>is dark side of the moon the greatest album of all time?
>if not, what is?
>>64056390
Alternative reality. We're in and out of them all the time, haven't you noticed? Maybe if you cum for me i'll show you more magic...
this thread... we're done... finished
game over man
game over
maya properties - chris weisman
it's on youtube --- possibly the best thing i've ever heard
>>64056493
>how could people who do not properly appreciate 'money' correct their carefully-crafted paradigms?
Learn music theory and start working on sound engineering.
>where did the paradigms come from?
Probably a listener's expectations, as well as personal bias.
>why are the paradigms so carefully-crafted?
Probably to prevent them from breaking when confronted with errors in their logic
>who crafted them?
The listener, but probably reinforced by social norm (see: "/mu/ told me not to like it, I'll go with that")
>do you think it has anything to do with capitalism?
To the extent that a listener's mindset is rooted in "This is the hit single, I will not like it!"
>is dark side of the moon the greatest album of all time?
No
>if not, what is?
What is the criteria?
>>64056441
Why do ppl keep pushing that only most of the album was about his depression and the vices of Lucy it was near the end where they talk about black empowerment but even then kendrick mentions the hypocrisy of black ppl when there's so much black on black violence
>>64056611
DA YAM IS DA POWA DAT BE
>>64056231
>DR6
>>64056589
Cobalt Jones?
>>64052856
Money is an okay song in an album filled with great songs, even accounting for the fact that it is a relic of the time when albums had multiple sides and it was essentially an introduction to part ii of the album. It is a very vanilla and frankly boring jazzy/bluesy number in an album whose other tracks were reaching for a "transcendent" quality. The song is merely okay even when isolated and is positively bad in lieu of the other songs on that album.
>>64056790
>It is a very vanilla and frankly boring jazzy/bluesy number
Do you know what time signature it's in?
>>64056790
Prepare yourself for a surreal interrogation.
money is the worst song on the fifth best pink floyd album
but please tell me all about how smells like teen spirit is the best nirvana song and how light my fire is the best doors song
this place gets more pleb everyday
I suppose I'll post a few of my 10/10's
>>64056932
I'm not satisfied with your post.
>>64056390
It's a meme band. They had to change their name a while back because of some legal thing.
>>64057058
I more just didn't even understand it. Nobody thinks either of those 2 songs are those bands' best
>>64057068
fucking yes. Love this record.
>>64056842
>intelligent discussion is so surreal!
Did /mu/ melt your brain that much?
>>64056932
>if it's popular, it sucks!
/mu/ did melt yours.
>>64057114
HEY THERE
LITTLE GIRL
One of my favorite records my man. I'm honestly so satisfied with just their entire band trajectory. They got better with every single record from the meh Daughters EP to the fantastic Hell Songs, and then the s/t just blew away everything I thought I knew about the band
>>64057171
>improper extreme EQ
>poorly recorded vocals
>DR8
>>64057090
I'd say it's actually a bad sign if you can readily unravel the basis of dumb posts on 4chan. It shows you have a decent framework to draw from as far as judging human behavior, but is also an indicator of a lot of time wasted and a lot of garbage cluttering and polluting the mind as a result.
Exposure and interaction with stupid people is best kept at a minimum, else your own mind becomes maladaptively suited to dealing with that kind of stimuli and avenue of thought. Life and the world would probably be net better if a good deal of websites didn't exist.
>>64054946
>wrong mixes of I Want You, Sad Eyed Lady, etc.
what does that mean?
>>64055151
>>64055251
They're definitely /mu/tants. Wouldn't be surprised if they self-posted their own shit here frequently.
>>64054946
PRO-TIP: a song not fitting in your carefully-crafted paradigm of reality isn't a flaw. The flaw is actually in you.
>>64057220
>what does that mean?
That they had mix problems and errors with those songs, so they had to revise it later on different pressings.
>>64057164
totally. They're supposedly back together & currently recording new songs for an eventual 4th album. I'm super excited to see where they go from here.
>>64057237
What song didn't fit "my reality"? What "reality" do you think I'm working on?
>>64055318
/mu/ won't admit it, but this one is definitely 10/10
>>64056818
Man, the slide solo on Sway hits me so hard
But I don't know if I'd call this 10/10. The second half (outside of moonlight mile) is kind of disappointing.
>>64057241
so you're judging their production rather than music?
>>64056835
This post is irrelevant because you can literally know nothing about the structure of a song and, if you don't like it's sound, you are correct about it being a bad song because you are referencing your own preference and musical aesthetics is completely subjective.
Notwithstanding, it was composed in either 7/4 or 7/8 time, but this fact is irrelevant since a listener with absolutely no knowledge of the song can deem the song to be bad and be correct. Neither was it innovative to use such a time signature, if innovation tickles your fancy.
The onus is on you to explain exactly, precisely why everybody else must find the song flawless and until you have presented a clear, logically sound, and complete proof that it is flawless, then everybody is correct about their subjective interpretation of the song.
Seriously. Point me to one thing that makes the song "flawless", otherwise it's simply a matter of taste. Tastes can be changed by unforeseen interesting aspects that were missed, so tell me, what exactly about Money should make me appreciate it even a little bit? The time signature? The saxophone? Tell me what, exactly.
>>64057341
This post is bad because production is a large part of the aesthetics of an album, whether it is tied to the music or not.
>>64057468
shit music with great production
great music with shit production
which one is objectively more patrish
tips fedora btw
>>64053116
Pleb
This is good
>>64055848
>>64055781 here
It may have always meant to be there but that doesn't necessarily mean it fits. It's hard to explain, I just think the rest of the album has this ethereal quality to it, sort of melancholy, existential vibes. Money just seems like a total sidetrack to all that particularly with how upbeat it sounds in comparison.
>>64056818
>>64057311
the first side honestly might be the greatest 20 minutes rock has ever produced
>>64052856
Off Minor- Heat Death Of The Universe
still very overlooked
>>64057900
My nigger OM's my favorite band. My personal 10's though are Cherry Peel and Hissing Fauna, but Coquelicot's a fantastic album. The crazy piano riffs and manic compositions make it so intriguing. I actually feel like Barnes was ever so slightly influenced by TMR when making it
>>64057260
Really? I have yet to hear about this, but that'd be fucking dope. Maybe I'll get to see them live!
>>64057090
>>64057201
I actually think you guys look pretty dumb too. It's not that hard to figure out.
What do those songs all have in common? Smells Like Teen Spirit, Light My Fire and Money...
>>64058259
I'm less concerned with if your post appears dumb, and more concerned with how I find it wanting. I'm not satisfied with it.
>>64058053
Black Up is a masterpiece.
>>64058790
-Social and cultural factors relative to personal context
-Perception and subjective experience are generated via the machinery of mind. The mechanical breakdown you just provide, whether it was an attempt to explain why you feel the way you do, or because that's the way you consciously listen, will not apply to everyone.
Music is multifaceted. A lot of things can make an otherwise banal song highly enjoyable, meaningful, or whatever. I don't actually remember much of Dark Side of the Moon, but a lot of things people seem to think is so great and has such depth sounds like a cluttered, boring, droning mess to me. Sounds a bit like everything I've ever heard, and nothin' I want to hear.
>>64057437
>it was composed in either 7/4 or 7/8 time
So thus it is not vanilla.
Thanks for playing
>>64057341
Wouldn't perfect 10s excel in both?
>but that doesn't necessarily mean it fits.
Sure. But in this case it does
>I just think the rest of the album has this ethereal quality to it, sort of melancholy, existential vibes
Oh like On The Run? Or Time?
No of course not. It's all one body of varying emotions. If you want to pick and choose what you like, that's fine. But "I don't like it" =/= flaw
>>64058259
What I said wasn't in regard to that. I even mentioned that I understand those are really popular mainstream tracks from their respective albums, I just said he's putting words in everyone's mouth by making fun of people who say SLTS or LMF are the best songs from those bands when literally no one said it
>>64058295
Hell ya man
>>64055325
eh
>>64054551
>>64054484
agreed
>>64058053
>My nigger OM's my favorite band
no way me too
>>64059142
Top knotch joke nigga. I prefer Advaitic Songs though
Wardruna is the bomb m8s
>>64054188
That album is, in fact, perfect. Great pick.
>>64054188
It's a beautiful album, and one of my all time favourites, but that one fucking song with the jingle bells piano melody fucking takes me out of the moment every time.
>>64060335
lol this album is a little too advanced for /mu/ to be considered a 10/10. you wont get any acknowledgement sorry just letting you know. /mu/ has never taken acid and doesnt 'get' it, its pointless to try and explain its epicness in the psychedelic world. its one of my personal favorite albums ever, the first section of the narrow way is a huge inspiration to me among other parts of the album
in utero
How was this not posted yet?
>>64060611
Better question, how has this not been posted yet
>>64053108
>>64053790
>>64053945
ye
>>64061172
Little pussy
>>64060445
My First Day On /mu/: The Post
Also
>the narrow way is a huge inspiration to me
>therefor the album is a 10
>>64061246
strong! penis! large vaginy.
>>64053695
undrr8d
>>64054778
her worst album
>>64055318
4/10 at best
>>64060445
my favourite with Obscured by Clouds
>>64052873
You didn't post a picture
>>64060611
Can't hear the vocals clearly enough.
>>64060445
>this whole post
a tip of the fedora to you too sir
>>64058534
More like The Subpars
Getting us back on track here
Listening to it right now
![Graceland_cover_-_Paul_Simon[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/ypAo9b0.jpg "Graceland_cover_-_Paul_Simon[1].jpg")
perfection
Also a shout-out to the ultimate pleb-filter, The Construkction of Light
>>64062567
>cultural appropriation
>>64062598
>SJW autism
>>64062629
What do you mean? I was pointing out a flaw
>>64062648
How is discovering new type of music and integrating it into your own a bad thing?
this
>>64062710
>Poor production
