>>63465381
i don't think anyone uses metacritic for music

dont blame the aggregator blame those being aggregrated you stupid cunt

AOTY.org is better anyways

>>63465381
Accurate scores

>>63465381
Metacritic adds up the scores of all the reviews you idiot it's not their fault.
And this >>63465406

>>63465381
both too low

>>63465381
both are shit albums haha

>>63465992
TBF, they give weight depending on the source (P4K would matter more than Scauruffi, for example.)

>>63465381
1981 is accurate. loom loom should be much lower jesus christ

>>63465381
It's terrible because you shouldn't 'rate' music with a numerical score

loom loom is shit deal with it nerd

Metacritic is unironically a good source for seeing what the general consensus for an album is but it's not the best source in the world

>>63466347
What's the best source?

>>63466621
Your own opinion

>>63466765
>implying your own opinion is more efficient at finding the best music compared to the amount of music publications go through before finding the extremely minute albums that are great

For me, Metacritic makes saves so much time by showing what's been reviewed by a large number of people. If many reviewed it, there's a high chance of it not being shit because no publication ever reviews trash.

>>63466906
Why not just use RYM?

Always trust fantano for music reviews

>>63465381
Loom is shirt nerd.

>>63469178
Fuck. Off.

>>63469189
>89
nice

>>63469203
Why? He's objectively the best music reviewer out there. His taste is 98% similar with /mu/tants

>>63469217
That's why he's bad

>>63466260
this

>>63469217
>98% similar to people who like Animal Collective, Beefheart, the list goes on
>good