ITT: Create some interesting music related Google Trends charts
townes van zandt and brostep both spiked in early 2015. spooky as fuck
>>63454788
what is going on? the interest in music seems to be declining generally...
>>63454862
that is indeed p weird
>>63454897
weird eh
>>63454983
good piracy is bad!!!
>>63455050
2009 spike was the grammys, he acutally did make her famous
kek
>>63454788
we bleeps and bloops now
What happened in 2012??
Someone compare death grips and teen suicide.
>>63455237
People thought the world was about to end and wanted to satisfy their fetish before they died
>>63455095
you're retarded
>>63455267
>thinking search values correlate to actual numbers
wow
>>63455095
sex video when?
a revolution is upon us
>>63455367
Yeah, that's really what I thought.
poor ringo
>>63455402
>small bump in 2006
prob a rise of masturbation problems
Factual proof that Syro was a forgettable and clunky album
>>63454983
you can see when netflix happened lol
It has begun
EAT SHIT
Radiohead was only better for like a month lol
>>63455587
All those Oasis searches come from wine moms looking for wallpapers and graphic design students stealing backgrounds from google images.
>>63455616
I'm more surprised that blur is so low despite being a fairly common word
truly they are shite
>even as a huge star, people will only care about you when you die
>>63455420
Well the others are kind of common names whereas ringo isn't.
>>63455237
Rick Santorum.
>>63455809
Proof that no matter how much of the shit you are, you are still nothing until you die.
>>63455587
The fuck?
How is Blur more popular than Radiohead?
>>63455809
>Normans don't know who Lou is and recently discovered Bowie
Is this a surprise for any of you?
>>63455977
what happens when you dont release an album for 5 years, plus they're not old enough for nostalgia factor yet
>>63455977
WOOHOO
>>63455977
>>63456038
Of course the word "blur" is more popular than the word "radiohead".
Apply some filters and you'll see something closer to how it really is.
The real question is how the fuck is Muse still so popular and how the fuck did Coldplay become so big?
>>63456215
>that poor TKOL spike not even half as big as In Rainbows
>>63456215
>how the fuck did Coldplay become so big?
were you under a rock between the years of 2002 and 2008
they were massive
in the early 2010's their popularity started to wane a bit, but now they're back on top
also Muse is super popular in latin america and amongst "deep" 14 year olds
>>63454897
To be fair, it could just be people learning how to properly find music rather than simply googling a genre
>>63455522
good
who 20 but feeling old here?
>>63457422
Syro was such a misfire.
>>63455850
not the same guy but here it is fixed
>>63457675
No it wasn't, it was just "another Aphex Twin album" when everyone was expecting some next-level shit for some reason. It's the same thing that gave people such a sour taste in their mouths over Random Access Memories. They're good, even great at times, but everyone wanted amazing.
>>63457994
holy shit, I'm surprised there's even ANY interest nowadays
>>63457994
also, typical right-wing c-class brazilian engineering student
weird considering two weeks was way more popular than my girls.
>>63458054
I'm neither c-class or right-wing
You're right about the rest
AARON BTFO
>>63458111
Grizzly Bear are insufferable to me for whatever reason, but I like most of the bands people consider similar. Am I wrong for hating them?
>>63458615
nah not really. I feel the same way. the only saving grace of the band is daniel rossen. dude is awesome and seems like a pretty good guy. I wish he'd release more solo stuff.
>>63457950
kek
>>63455237
Vaporwave
>>63458467
nice filename
>>63455507
Italians confirmed cucks
>>63460710
that fucking projection.. fucking northern hemisphere assholes
