Holy shit I love this album. After 2 listens I'm in love
it's pretty good, 6.6/10. Love the more pleasant, happy soundscapes. Kinda reminds me of Mort Gorson
>>63451370
I really like the combination of break core with the modular bassy synth sound. 7.5/10
>>63451651
>>63451370
when did we start just rattling off ratings with small sentences instead of actually discussing music?
>>63451734
They think they're rolling stone I guess
>>63451734
how do you feel about this album then? I would love to write a paragraph on this album but my English is too bad to do that
>>63451370
>it's pretty good, 6.6/10
I think you mean 8/10
>>63451370
>it's pretty good, 6.6/10
I think you mean 6.7/10
Haven't really checked this but you should hear the last step stuff also.
>>63451796
>can differentiate to and too
>my English is too bad
lmao
>>63452932
thanks m8
Did it get any better?
>bleeppleb reporting
it's the only Venetian Snares album I have ever listened to: did he released other stuff equally good or similar?
>>63452790
This is the most myopic way of rating.
5/10 is the borderline. A 5/10 album you don't like or dislike, so a 6/10 is something you do like, and thus think is pretty good.
The idea that 7/10 is average is something only school children believe.
>>63453744
>implying rating systems aren't completely subjective
In my system there are varying degrees of good between 6-10 and anything below is lumped together as 'shit'
>>63452932
as a non-native speaker i don't understand how anyone could confuse "then" and "than" or "to" and "too".
same thing with "das" and "dass" in german. it's soo easy...
>>63451734
I mean I reviewed it on my friend's blog, but /mu/ doesn't usually read long reviews of albums like that. I rarely see people do it around here.
>>63451651
agreed, it gives the tracks a lovely texture. And the drums drive a variety of tempos that makes the tracks multi-faceted while still feeling linear, which is cool.
>>63453843
I mean I guess do whatever you want, but that system makes hardly any sense
>>63453654
Try Huge Chrome Cylinder Box Unfolding. It's not exactly similar but it's the closest sounding to Traditional Synthesizer Music.
>>63454370
Come back when you get a 60% in school and tell everyone it's "pretty good"
>>63454430
But that's a skewed system, not a normal distribution. Do you even statistics?
>>63453654
he fell off hard and this (and arguably filth) are his redeeming albums, but still not as good as his old shit
huge chrome cylinder box unfolding and winter in the belly of a Snake are the two closest to this new album
>>63454457
If 60% of your album is good, then it's not really that good.
Did that help explain it for you? lol
>>63454430
Come back when you've graduated grade school.
>>63454771
Except it is though.
More than half of it is good.
It is more good than bad.
It is good.
>>63454771
That's your opinion. And a rating out of 10 is not HOW MUCH of it is good ,but HOW GOOD it is. A song can have good and bad parts, and some songs are just okay but may be so forgettable that you really dislike it.
Also you're kinda putting your foot in your mouth, because if that is how you like to view music then
60% good
40% bad
therefore, it's more good than bad. A good album
wait why am I having to explain this elementary logic to you again?
>>63454823
I guess you just have lower standards.
link pls senpai
>>63454874
wtf lol it has nothing to do with "standards" man. You could use our actually logically stable system, and only have 5 albums you've considered "good"(over a 5) ever. You clearly aren't using your head or just have tragically bad reasoning skills
>>63454874
yeah thats why I banged ur mom
>>63454867
If an album is 10/10, that means it's perfect, there's nothing you would change.
If it's 9/10, we can assume that about 10% of the album is stuff that you would rather change somehow.
And so on.
>>63454927
Again, if you get more than half the questions correct on a test, by your standards it's a "good" score. Makes no sense to me but hey, wtf do I know compared to the geniuses on here lol.
>>63454961
Well I disagree with you only with the fact that perfection is literally impossible in music, that's what makes it art. So if you found half the album stuff you wish was different, and half you thought was perfect, you give it a 5/10 and call it a decent album. You're agreeing with me anon and you don't even know it
>>63455003
read>>63454457
Please stay on topic
>>63454430
You can't use a fucking grading rubric as a rating scale. If kids could get as low as 51% and still pass then public education would be even more useless than it already is. Grading scales operate differently from rating how good a movie/album/tv show/whatever is. The show doesn't fail if it's 60% in the same way that a student fails if they get a 60%. It's not applicable.
You've fallen for the inflated ratings meme, sorry to say. Fix your mind.
Everybody here gets a 6/10 rating for posting style and attractiveness. Great job guys, you're all 6/10's. Feels good eh.
>>63451370
3 star rating system is better than any other rating system.
1 = shit
2 = decent - good
3 = very good
>>63455109
6s still get laid, anon. I assume you're the guy who's mad everyone actually uses all 10 ratings on a 10-point scale so this complex math might be beyond your grasp
Welp bump I guess. Fucking thread got derailled by a stupid fucking discussion about how to rate an album. Fuck you /mu/, you will do anything to avoid talking about music. Bunch of plebs
>inb4 >mad
>>63451370
>>63451651
>>63453744
>>63453843
>>63454457
>>63454823
>>63454796
>>63454867
>>63454927
>>63455040
>>63455078
>>63456275
I had no fucking idea /mu/ was this based. True 10-Point Scale Bros assemble.
>>63456334
I thought it was really interesting. I have pleb experience with bleep music but I really enjoyed this project and thought certain parts emulated the warmth of something like a Super Nintendo soundtrack. Very pleasant IDM (I assume it's IDM, at least, bleep genres are hard to differentiate for me) that was engaging and warranted a lot of repeatability
>>63456334
>Fuck you /mu/, you will do anything to avoid talking about music
This is literally any board on 4chan.
>>63456550
>carbonated beverages
p l e b
>>63456550
>Dr Pepper anywhere above low tier
>Cherry Coke above Classic Coke
>no Vanilla Coke
>Fanta not shit tier
