Why does /mu/ hate Tame Impala?
They are literally the new Beatles.
/mu/ has mixed opinions on just about everything.
I've seen alot of love AND hate for Tame Impala. Personally I think they're fucking awesome.
You can't be the new Beatles if all you do is rip off the actual Beatles.
This is officially an Oh No! It's Devo thread
Shitty normie music. So indeed, the new Beatles.
>>63384567
You have already explained why they're not worthwhile
What's a good song/album to start with?
Time Flies really didn't pique my interest, but i've been told they've got a pretty diverse output?
>>63384817
Depends on what you like more, pop or rock.
Rock: Innerspeaker
Pop: Currents
Both equally: Lonerism
>>63384705
HELLO
Pretty much.
>>63384830
first impression:
Alter ego's pretty awesome.
Elephant's kind of aimless
Let it happen's kind of boring
>>63384999
Elephant is the worst song on Lonerism
>>63385106
I wouldn't say the worst. It's the lead single. It's like their Come Together.
>>63384567
Because you keep making this thread.
>>63385106
yra loser that is a prime song
>>63385307
good call
I listened to Lonerism and it's good. Haven't heard there other stuff
>>63384675
This
>>63384675
/thread
it's music for le quirky weed lmao college student with a beard and eyeglasses
>>63387172
fuck you die
>>63387188
aww babby got offended cuz u fit the stereotype? its ok sweetie
>>63384675
But The Beatles ripped off everyone, too.
garbage band
>>63387172
>people who I don't like like it so it's bad!
Try harder.
>>63387220
he never said the beatles were good
>>63387253
>try harder
):< you sound annoyed bby. are u ok? i never said it's bad
>>63387277
Who cares if Tame Impala rips off The Beatles.
>>63387316
i do.
>>63384567
Why wouldn't I just listen to the Beatles
Because the Olivia Tremor Control did the same thing but much better like ten years ago.
>>63387466
THIS. and it's not over-polished crap
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jUjd6DHAutU
>>63387253
>punctuation on an imageboard
>says others try hard
>>63384999
>999▶>>63385106
>>>63384830
>first impression:
>Alter ego's pretty awesome.
>Elephant's kind of aimless
>Let it happen's kind of boring
This.
Also shallow art girls thinking they're breakthrough music has gotten pretty old.
>>63384730
normies don't give a shit about tame impala
>>63387432
Why? Bands over time have tried to continue on with their sound like >>63387466, and you don't hate their music.
>>63387627
i like the first tame impala album. i wouldn't praise it as a masterpiece like most impalafags do, but it's a pleasant listen. lonerism was a step in the wrong direction and currents is a steaming pile of shit. i don't dislike them because they sound like the beatles. the reason why we've been saying that they ripped off the beatles is because you guys keep trying to say that they're the new beatles. how could you even view the two on the same level? the beatles did what tame impala are doing over 50 years ago. if anything, they're a tribute to the beatles, not a fucking reincarnation.
Only go backwards is boring as fuck
im honestly confused as to why taht song is so popular. at least with elephant i could kinda understand
No love for Apocalypse Dreams? I'm not a huge Lonerism fan, I prefer Innerspeaker my self, but that song is DOPE
>>63384675
>if all you do is rip off the actual Beatles.
what about Currents?, not so beatles desu, its like a mix of every band from that era, plus some lo fi tricks to stay hype
>Innerspeaker
weed ayy lmao with some potential
>Lonerism
late 60's mood
>Currents
>70's
I remember when /mu/ loved Tame Impala. Fuck all of you faggots.
>>63388934
i remember it too and i don't miss it. fuck u nigga
>>63388934
I love TI
>>63384567
I like psychedelic music and I know their sounds are recicled from other bands and there songwriting its poor. I dont hate it but most of the songs bores me.
they're not even in the beatles
