pic rel8ed
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /mu/ - Music
You are currently reading a thread in /mu/ - Music
pic rel8ed
what brilliant mind enables one to come from this...
>>63217305
to this
>>63217279
damn i feel u OP. surprised no critics called him out on that. we're new here was even better than in colour.
how do you go from thi
>>63217502
to this
>>63217279
They are both on the cutting edge of modern UK dance music, just he transitioned from garage to house and house is slightly more plebbly but still just as good
Jamie xx truly a maverick for dance music today and contrarians won't admit it just because he actually gets the attention he deserves
If In Colour was some obscure release on Hyperdub and sold like 5,000 units /bleep/ would be saying it's the best thing ever I swear
>>63217632
nah, man is making shit we saw 5 years ago. Course normies don't know this
>>63217672
I'm not super into dance music but around 2010 Actress was the hot new thing right, jamie xx is on a higher level than actress
>>63217672
I agree with you. I was quite excited to listen to In Colour and by the end I thought "really?" It feels very middle of the road to me. Sure it's a good album and it was well made because Jamie is very talented, but it never felt groundbreaking. Using the same sample as Chrome Sparks' song Marijuana to worse effect really put me off.
Serious question:
How do you go from this?
>>63217818
To this?
>>63217836
to this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yqQ7tU26Q6E
>>63217860
To this?
>>63217902
>Skittles
>Not Asiatic Tiger
>>63217902
i refuse to believe that is noah lennox
>>63218981
that's eminem you walnut
