Which is better?
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /mu/ - Music
You are currently reading a thread in /mu/ - Music
Which is better?
>>63185073
Depends on your setup.
Mono obviously
>>63185083
>>63185107
I'm talking about British vs. American tracklist, not mono vs. stereo
>>63185138
Well at least you made it obvious
>>63185171
It should've been obvious considering the Parlophone and Capitol versions are side by side.
>>63185073
Nowhere Man > If I Needed Someone > I've Just Seen a Face > Drive My Car >What Goes On > It's Only Love
>>63185073
The Beatles music is too namby pamby. Great melodies and jolly music, but jolly music is a bit of a downer when you want to feel some chaos in your soul.
>>63185401
Listen to their later stuff.
Strawberry Fields Forever and Tomorrow Never Knows are far from jolly. There's less jolly tracks on Rubber Soul and onward.
>>63185401
>For No One
>Strawberry Fields Forever
>A Day in the Life
>Tomorrow Never Knows
Mono Parlophone.
>>63185401
why would you want to feel sad instead of jolly
>>63185401
Hi Scaruffi
>>63185401
The fact that so many books still name the Beatles as “the greatest or most significant or most influential” rock band ever only tells you how far rock music still is from becoming a serious art. Jazz critics have long recognized that the greatest jazz musicians of all times are Duke Ellington and John Coltrane, who were not the most famous or richest or best sellers of their times, let alone of all times. Classical critics rank the highly controversial Beethoven over classical musicians who were highly popular in courts around Europe. Rock critics are still blinded by commercial success. The Beatles sold more than anyone else (not true, by the way), therefore they must have been the greatest. Jazz critics grow up listening to a lot of jazz music of the past, classical critics grow up listening to a lot of classical music of the past. Rock critics are often totally ignorant of the rock music of the past, they barely know the best sellers. No wonder they will think that the Beatles did anything worthy of being saved.
>>63186534
Yeah dude, we get it, The Beatles aren't actually noteworthy.
Contrarian opinions, yada yada yada.
>>63185171
it is extremely obvious to anyone that isn't retarded
brittish is better, as much as i love ive just seen a face, drive my car is better
>>63185401
THE FACT THAT
The first one because it doesn't look like shit.
