>>61912822
yes, although most of queen music is shit

P I P E S
I P E S P
P E S P I
E S P I P
S P I P E
P I P E S

>>61912838
It's like panning for gold - there's a lot of shit to sift through, but their almost all of their hits are amazingly good compositions.

>>61912822
Of course. No one had or has the same vocal range than him. You can talk about sentiment and those things that fedoras talk about, but if you say that Dylan, Cera or a random punk guy is a better singer, you're objectively idiot.

famlee....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mLbOBoa8vD8

>>61912896
yes, and some of their 70s work is pretty good too

>>61912941
Is Rock 'N Roll a different enough genre to exclude it (and therefore Elvis) from this discussion? Otherwise I concede that it's at least a tie, if not in Elvis's favor. But Freddie was a better writer.

>>61912965
Yep. 70's Queen vs 80's Queen is as much a difference in quality as 80's Metallica vs 90's Metallica...well, almost.

>>61912855
i like pepsi

>>61913261
Sugary shit breh enjoy your beetus

>>61913268
>not turning to a bigger cup of Pepsi