Do you consider this good singing? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y1Wx5DjG80s
>>61608345
Define "good".
>>61608345
10/10 album
you can't prove me wrong
>>61608345
still the best post punk revival album
im not saying it's a 10 though
yes it is
effective and appropriate singing
not technically "good"
Yes, it is.
no
>>61608581
considering it's competition, that's not saying much
>>61608345
Is it technically "good"? Maybe not
but quality music isn't really defined by the individual parts but as a whole, would you agree?
SHE CAN READ
>>61608703
shitting on interpol is your fetish or smthng?
>>61608345
Technically good? No. Good? Yes.
>>61608545
NYC and Say hello to the angels is meh
>>61610004
>NYC is bad
say that to my face fucker and see what happens
>>61608545
Literally all their albums after it are complete fucking garbage.
>>61608345
el pintor is better
>>61610287
how can one man be so wrong
>>61610287
Wrong
TOTBL - 10/10
Antics - 9/10
OLTA - 8/10
Interpol - 6/10
El Pintor - 8/10
>>61610004
I agree on Say Hello To The Angels, though the outro is fantastic.
>>61610441
Accurate
>>61610441
Holy shit that rating inflation.
TOTBL is maybe a 9/10
Antics is maybe a 7/10
The other albums are mediocre or shit
>>61608345
senpai yes
All my favorite singers couldn't sing
>>61608345
technically good singers are boring
are you going to do the same argument with Iceage
>>61610488
I'm willing to bet you've never actually listened to them, and just looked at the Pitchfork reviews.
>>61610573
Only album I haven't heard is El Pintor. I don't know about the pitchfork ratings.
>>61610637
Bullshit
Anyway, El Pintor is good.
