Because it is
>>61373819
Not an answer.
Because it has thes intruments and stuff.
>>61373782
because /mu/ is full of nerds who think nerdy fantasy shit is cool
It's got a scream man
>>61373782
It was one of the first progressive rock albums and has influenced countless bands and artists. The album features great tracks that have been constructed through composing and improvising. Some tracks also have ambience in them. The instrumentation is rich. Musicians are great. Whats wrong with it op?
the 40th anniversary CD release is spectacular to hear
sound separation/volume/quality is godly
one of the best recordings of all time, better than most classical music even
>>61374229
Nothing is wrong, i just find it okay. Nothing spectacular IMO.
>>61374380
Opinion disregarded.
Influence nigga its objectively influential as fuck
>>61374946
Useful post.
>>61373782
Because its not. You should really learn to stay away from what ever /mu/ likes the proof is in the puddin'
>Swans
>St. vincent
>death grips
>AnCo
>Beatles
>>61373782
Because it's the King Crimson album they were told to listen to.
It's not a bad album by any means, but Red is better.
>>61374380
Check out Red, another album by King Crimson. Personally it's my favorite album by them.
>>61375188
>>61375219
so close to being right
starless is better than anything on pic-related though
>>61375265
I've tried to get into Lark's Tongue in Aspic, but I just can't do it. It just sounds like shit to me. I'm a fan of their later work, but I just can't stand their "improv" albums (ie Starless and Bible Black)
>>61373782
30 years ahead of it's time
Solo is revolutionary
>>61374999
>i just find it okay. Nothing spectacular IMO.
Useful criticism.
>>61373910
This
>>61375440
I was asked what was wrong with it, and i answered. You just posted crap.
>>61375503
"It's just ok, nothing spectacular" is about as close to a non-answer as you can get. There's nothing in that statement that indicates you've even listened to the album.
>>61375629
Other than me giving my opinion on it.
>>61375327
and yet you happen to like the talking heads copy cat band of the 80s?
Adrian Belew ruined King Crimson
>>61375831
And I disregarded it because it's a completely unsupported opinion that offered no further discussion.
>>61375910
I wasn't asked to give an amazingly detailed opinion.
>>61375877
Not allowed to like different things? I just like the think of the different incarnations of KC as different bands entirely. Besides, can you really say he "ruined" KC if it was unsure if they were ever even going to reform after Red?
>>61375877
Copy cat? They're two very different bands. Find me a Talking Heads song that sounds like Industry, or Dig Me, or Requiem. Saying that King Crimson in the 80s was just a Talking Heads rip off is just retarded
Great Deceiver is an underrated song tbqh
>>61376991
le health food faggot face
>>61375265
Starless is their best song, but Lark's is better overall, but Starless and Bible Black is their best album.
