>I repeat myself when under stress
>I repeat myself when under stress
>I repeat myself when under stress
>I repeat myself when under stress
>I repeat
In all seriousness, what did King Crimson mean by this?
It was a dumbass dad joke they put in
Would be a 10/10 album if not for that. It's 9.99/10 as it is.
>>61335991
nearly nonsensical quotable lyrics to copy Remain in Light/TH
not that I'm complaining, I wish everyone would copy that album
>>61335991
I'm I the only one who thinks that 80s King Crimson is incredibly sub-par? Even Discipline isn't that great to me
King Crimson evolution
Pure Prog > Hard Rock > New Wave / Experimental > Metal
Always keeping the progressive style
which do you like most?
>>61336084
Pure Prog means absolutely nothing and they were still "progressive" in the 70s
>>61335991
it was from a letter that his wife wrote him
>>61336137
1969-1973: Prog
1974: Hard Rock
1981-1984: New Wave, Experimental
1995-Now: Metal
Like I said, always keeping the progressive style
>>61336394
why is 74 considered "Hard Rock"
Look at Red, Starless, Fracture, Fallen Angel, Lament, Starless and Bible Black, and Providence
How are those tracks not prog?
>>61336084
>Pure Prog
what did he mean by this?
Pink Floyd was better