How was early Nirvana so good? Why did they have to ruin the

Thread replies: 14
Thread images: 3

Anonymous
2015-12-26 08:06:41 Post No. 61273383
[Report] Image search: [Google]

File: Early_Nirvana[1].jpg (27 KB, 362x416) Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2015-12-26 08:06:41 Post No. 61273383 [Report]

How was early Nirvana so good? Why did they have to ruin their legacy with shitty pop albums (Nevermind, In Uterus, MTV Unplugged)?

Post the good stuff;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HMDGO8RjJEg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6PL3HVCreWM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HwYzzN1AIqw

>>

Anonymous 2015-12-26 08:07:35 Post No.61273395
[Report]

Anonymous 2015-12-26 08:07:35 Post No.61273395 [Report]

can we stop this "bleach was good" meme?

>>

Anonymous 2015-12-26 08:08:20 Post No.61273405
[Report]

Anonymous 2015-12-26 08:08:20 Post No.61273405 [Report]

>>61273395
can we stop this "any album I don't like is a meme" meme?

>>

Anonymous 2015-12-26 08:08:47 Post No.61273410
[Report]

Anonymous 2015-12-26 08:08:47 Post No.61273410 [Report]

>>61273383
They didn't get good until OK Computer.

>>

Anonymous 2015-12-26 08:10:14 Post No.61273424
[Report]

Anonymous 2015-12-26 08:10:14 Post No.61273424 [Report]

>>61273383
Their early stuff is ok, but White Pony is their magnum opus.

>>

Anonymous 2015-12-26 08:11:55 Post No.61273431
[Report]

Anonymous 2015-12-26 08:11:55 Post No.61273431 [Report]

>>61273424
Their early work was a little too new wave for my taste, but when Sports came out in '83, I think they really came into their own, commercially and artistically.

>>

Anonymous 2015-12-26 08:27:17 Post No.61273557
[Report]

Anonymous 2015-12-26 08:27:17 Post No.61273557 [Report]

>>61273395
Exactly. Never
Ind was their best album with unplugged the runner up stop being contrarian just listen to the fucking words. Bleach was literally shit. Not deep at all. Just stop guys. It's fucking annoying and insulting.

>>

Anonymous 2015-12-26 08:28:28 Post No.61273567
[Report]

Anonymous 2015-12-26 08:28:28 Post No.61273567 [Report]

>>61273383
http://vocaroo.com/i/s0JWQZVm90ou

>>

Anonymous 2015-12-26 08:30:54 Post No.61273580
[Report]

Anonymous 2015-12-26 08:30:54 Post No.61273580 [Report]

They have always been far and away my least favorite of the major grunge bands. Don't care for their sound or their melodies, don't care for Cobain's voice or persona, REALLY don't care for his lyrics. Of all the groups that came out of that era, Nirvana seems to be the only one that consistently sounded like a goddamn garage band while everyone else was doing interesting things with rhythm and effects and instrumentation. I grew up indoctrinated with this idea that they were the epitome of grunge music or even 90s rock in general, but it wasn't until my early twenties that I realized how little I give a shit about them.

Soundgarden and Alice in Chains are my jam. Pearl Jam is my jam. I'm listening to Screaming Trees right now and they are infinitely more my jam than Nirvana.

Sorry to shit on your parade, OP. I just needed to say it. At least we're in agreement that their later stuff was garbage.

>>

Anonymous 2015-12-26 10:19:20 Post No.61274304
[Report]

Anonymous 2015-12-26 10:19:20 Post No.61274304 [Report]

>>61273580

That's because nirvana was a punk band and you have shitty taste and thus prefer the slimy bro rock bullshit that made up the grunge "genre"

>>

Anonymous 2015-12-26 14:33:56 Post No.61276261
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2015-12-26 14:33:56 Post No.61276261 [Report]

File: 1451012832953.jpg (53 KB, 419x480) Image search: [Google]