Why aren't Genesis considered /mu/ core?
- Home
- Board: /mu/ - Music
- Reading: Why aren't Genesis considered /mu/ core?
Why aren't Genesis considered /mu/ core?
Because they are terrible.
*holds up spork*
Because Phil Collins and Peter Gabriel were better without those wastemen
>>61223056
Name one good album that is considered /mu/core
>>61223099
Gentle Giant, Cardiacs and Magma.
>>61223073
*Steve Hackett and Peter Gabriel
whoops, that was an embarrassing mistake
>>61223121
You forgot Anthony Phillips
whoops that was an embarrassing mistake
Gabriel > Hackett >>> Collins > Rutherford (Mike + The Mechanics) >>>Banks.
>>61223050
Because they're actually good
>>61223222
you forgot tylo be chillin
whoops that was an ambarassing mistake
>>61223233
>Collins not first
Pleb.
>>61223050
/mu/ hates any prog that's not King Crimson or shitty quirkcore like Magma and The Mars Volta.
>>61223348
genesis IS quirkcore though
>>61223305
>implying Collins is better than Gabriel
Does it matter?
Collins was better in Brand X
>>61223348
How is TMV Quirkcore?
>>61223050
Because they're actually talented
>>61223348
This
I'll just leave this here
>Discography for the most part
https://mega.nz/#F!XhJVhARI!rz3BHnmA5CCmYvQD726hwg
>>61223050
/mu/ has shit taste.
>>61223233
True.
>>61223348
>The Mars Volta is quirkier than le flower mane
>2015
>newfriends still don't understand what /mu/core is
>>61223050
Because they aren't bad enough
>>61223348
Or avant-shit and krautrock
