ITT: Unique albums.
BSSM > Atom Heart Mother
>>61199654
>RHCP
Forty kekerinos.
>>61199649
Every album is unique, anon. Please explain why AHM is more unique than, let's say, A Saucerful?
>>61199654
>(You)
>>61199654
no you faggit, this is better
>>61199780
>green day
>green FUCKING day
I'd rather listen to >>61199654, take your cancerous bullshit back to reddit.
>>61199649
>>61199756
>Every album is unique, anon.
Some are more than others.
>Please explain why AHM is more unique than, let's say, A Saucerful?
What other album has a psychedelic suite with orchestra, brass band and choir and a 10+ minute sound collage with a rock band jamming over a recording of a man eating breakfast?
This is probably one of the few actual albums anywhere close to being unique (for good reason, mind)
>>61199816
>Some are more than others.
No, not at all
What other album has the exact same tracks as another one?
>>61199854
Wow you're pedantic
Fight the good fight, dipshit
>>61199854
It's not about having the exact same tracks, but the same style. Will you say top 40 pop is as heterogeneous as experimental music?
>>61199881
Nice ad hominem
>>61199895
So would you say there are no albums in the style of AHM, without resorting to "What other album has a psychedelic suite with orchestra, brass band and choir and a 10+ minute sound collage with a rock band jamming over a recording of a man eating breakfast"?
>>61199911
>So would you say there are no albums in the style of AHM, without resorting to pointing out the characteristics that make it different from the rest?
Fuck off, dude.
>>61199953
Nah, without resorting to a description of the tracks, as you said it's not having the exact same tracks
>>61199823
This is b8 right? Dalek and B L A C K I E also do aggressive shit like this
>>61199867
I'd say this shared things with Talking Heads (specifically remain in light), Of Montreal (that whole gay clubbing feel), hell even the Scissor Sisters.
It's a great album, but is by no means unique
>>61199965
Again, it's not about having the exact same tracks, but a similar style and features.
>>61199816
>a 10+ minute sound collage with a rock band jamming over a recording of a man eating breakfast
why would anyone want another album with that? do people actually listen to Alan's Psychedelic Breakfast?
>>61200101
You may not like it but you can't say it's not something unique.
post something truly unique
>>61199967
I don't think the people who compare Dalek and Death Grips ever heard Dalek to begin with. MC Dälek never screamed on his microphone like a madman, neither was his production overly blatantly digital like this of DG, even though it was still noisy. B L A C K I E is similar to DG, but Dalek is more similar to Clipping
>>61200168
is this actually good or are you just posting it because it's obscure?
>>61199817
I'd say this is the only truly unique album here.
John Cage reciting stories
David Tudor fucking around with toys, tape loops and radios
Both in two entirely isolated rooms, unaware of what one-another are doing. It's beautiful to hear co-incidences between the stories and the music, how a climax in the story might co-incide with a loud crash of radio static.
>>61200514
you mean aside from his other albums from that era? And the hundreds of Bowie copycats you get, or the darker side of glam it helped make?
>>61200553
The overall sound. Bowie's vocals, the bass.
>>61199800
>cancerous bullshit
and yet you're a dumb weeaboo
>>61199817
One of my favorite albums, disappointed to see it posted here, especially in such a shitty thread
>>61200629
I feel the situation called for it, it's truly unique. Not that tape/radio things hadn't been done, but his application of indeterminacy and the spoken word aspect as well makes it pretty novel
>>61200310
only correct answer so far