[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y / ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo

ITT: Albums that will be studied, analysed and discussed by academia for decades to come.


Thread replies: 14
Thread images: 5

File: MBDTF_ALT.jpg (48KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
MBDTF_ALT.jpg
48KB, 300x300px
ITT: Albums that will be studied, analysed and discussed by academia for decades to come.
>>
TPAB obviously
>>
File: maxresdefault (3).jpg (43KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
maxresdefault (3).jpg
43KB, 1920x1080px
>>61159195
John maus already did tbqh and he's a professor
ariel>kanye
>>
>>61159195
Yes. Memeologists will be trying to figure out why this album ever became popular to begin with.
>>
File: THE ARK WORK.jpg (923KB, 1500x1500px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
THE ARK WORK.jpg
923KB, 1500x1500px
>>
>>61159232
Uh, the multiple catchy, well produced hit songs?
>>
>>61159264
>catchy
Lol
>well produced hits
Got me there. Same reason Bieber was such a commercial powerhouse.
>>
>>61159325
Those songs are catchy, I mean there is a reason they were popular. Talk to any person who listens exclusively to Top 40, they know nothing of production. They care about catchy hooks. They don't even know what production means, and if they do they think it means sound quality.
>>
File: 61rY6yM8HWL.jpg (121KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
61rY6yM8HWL.jpg
121KB, 500x500px
>>
File: 1450564298575.jpg (21KB, 320x320px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1450564298575.jpg
21KB, 320x320px
>>
>>61159418
I like this meme
>>
>>61159195
>>61159216

this
>>
Kanye will be studied in music conservatories, he will become school to new producers
>>
>>61159195
Do you have a link to any reputible analyses of this album. I don't mean 33 1/3 level analysis, I'm talk peer-reviewed, academic analyses of this album? It's been out for years now, the dust has settled, where's the papers?
Thread replies: 14
Thread images: 5
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y / ] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
If a post contains illegal content, please click on its [Report] button and follow the instructions.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need information for a Poster - you need to contact them.
This website shows only archived content and is not affiliated with 4chan in any way.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoin at 1XVgDnu36zCj97gLdeSwHMdiJaBkqhtMK