Amazon Review Thread
- Home
- Board: /mu/ - Music
- Reading: Amazon Review Thread
1. Search for one of your favorite albums on amazon
2. Sort by 1 star reviews
3. Cap and post results
This is for MPP. Why the fuck are they comparing it to Pink Floyd and complaining about font choices in the liner notes? Why are both reviews mostly the same?
>>61120434
>MPP
>repetitive
>>61120434
Guy on top is obviously mocking the other guy
I'm a solid Radiohead fan, and have bought all their albums to date. But I'll be frank. This album sucks. It's all queazy instrumentals that any stoned college rock band could do. I know the talent of this group, and they must have needed a quick album or something for this one -- I can't imagine them re-doing any single one of the songs on this album to perfect it -- it's all just abstract instrumentals. I couldn't make out a single word in any song -- just mumblings.
If I ever have 3 phenomenal albums and am hard up for cash, I might, too, go into a studio, warm up for 90 min when I'm stoned, and call it a wrap.
for kid A
>>61121651
>He can't into Beefheart or Ween
>Suggests They Might Be Giants
>tfw none of my favorite albums have 1 star reviews on amazon
It's hard being patrician
One of my favorites has 7 reviews, and 6 of them are 5 stars and one is 3 stars, but it's still positive
Beat that
wew lad
>>61121861
>yankee hotel fox crap
Burn of the century right there.
>>61121861
YHF is a goldmine
>>61121861
How could anyone sue over a sample of a recording of numbers station? It's not like The Conet Project owns that audio anymore than Wilco does, it's found sound
music really bad in south africa guys
Illmatic
This sort of made me laugh.
>>61122514
this review is for endtroducing by the way
this review of loveless is incredibly pretentious and stupid
this is happening
>this guy just spouts out random nonsense and references completely unrelated albums, 10/10
