So is this actually good? I liked In Utero. Nevermind not so much but still decent.

no its shit

try soundgarden spoon man

>>61048748
tips fedora*

>>61048730
When did you guys grow out of Nirvana? Me I think I was about 17

Yeah it's good but In Utero's their best

Worth the price of admission for Negative Creep.

>>61048730
Don't really like it, it's all over the place

I also prefer In Utero but I think Incesticide is pretty damn good too. Bleach is too chaotic and most of the songs aren't all that great.

This was my first Nirvana album, still think it holds up as their best, much more raw than the others, heavier and more aggresion

>>61048730
Incesticide > In Utero > Nevermind = Bleach

In Utero = Nevermind > Bleach = Incesticide

Incesticide > Nevermind > Bleach > In Utero

Bleach > Incesticide > Nevermind > In Utero

>>61048748
wow, I didn't know this was a cringe thread

In Utero > Nevermind = Incesticide > Bleach

>>61048730
It's a raw album, in the same style as the shit that influenced them... dirty, crunchy blown out speaker rock with a guy muttering and screaming to himself.

For the genre it's pretty good but nothing compared to what Nirvana became once they had some quality production on their side.

are you serious
in utero>bleach>mtv>nevermind>muddy banks>ncesticide

>>61048772
13

>>61048730
It's fucking garbage.

Nevermind and In Utero are far better.

It's definitely not a GREAT album, but it's still incredibly enjoyable. A lot of it really is style over substance, and is in a similar vein to Mudhoney albeit a little more Punk. Very raw without much to back it up, but that's kinda the point.