[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
ITT: post your curve
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /mu/ - Music

Thread replies: 140
Thread images: 38
File: c.png (51 KB, 1095x814) Image search: [Google]
c.png
51 KB, 1095x814
ITT: post your curve
>>
>>60660295
I have no idea what site/program you're using.
>>
>>60660325
how was your first day on mu?
>>
>>60660325
>>>/v/
>>
>>60660295
this guy is literally fucking everywhere on RYM and nobody's ever mentioned him on /mu/ before? is he just the elephant in the room we have to ignore?
>>
File: Capture.png (20 KB, 1270x488) Image search: [Google]
Capture.png
20 KB, 1270x488
>>60660325
lurk more
>>
>>60660342
Solid curve m8
>>
>having 5.0s and 0.5s

lmao I was like lmao
>>
File: 1433522519140.jpg (45 KB, 960x540) Image search: [Google]
1433522519140.jpg
45 KB, 960x540
>>60660367
>5.0s don't exist, because nothing is perfect
>>
>>60660352
yours is pretty solid too
i like the name for your 0.5 ratings
>>
>adding descriptions to your ratings
>going out of your way to listen to music you don't like to "perfect" your curve
>having more than five 5 stars
>rating singles
>trying to not have your rating too different from your friends'

daily reminder that if you do any of the above you're literally cancer
>>
>>60660457
>having more than five 5 stars
what's wrong with this
>>
>>60660454
Yeah, when I was thinking how I should present the thing that are a 1/10 to me. I kinda wanted to emphasize that it's my opinion and that I also wanted to make it not being a "this is a literal 1/10".

The whole way I've set up my scale is that it's just based on the scale of the worst and best things I've heard. Making it represent literal 1's and 10's is weird to me.
>>
>>60660457
having a rating system like no_ or sellmeagod is infinitely more cancerous than having a lot of high ratings

only some faggot on /mu/ would disagree
>>
>>60660457
If you don't rate singles, you are LITERALLY /mu/core / Pitchfork / Fantano drone. There's no way to be knowledgeable about music as a whole if you don't explore single-driven genres. You can't even listen to music from the early 60s and before (fucking DECADES) if you ignore singles. You're a misguided, childish, newfag, rockist. Kill yourself.
>>
>>60660519
I honestly think rating singles is dumb personally. You can do track ratings instead. The only exception is if it is a EP length Single release, or it's not on an album (though I still think it should be at minimum two tracks then).

But that's me personally.

>>60660457
>going out of your way to listen to music you don't like to "perfect" your curve
I really don't get why people do this.
>>
>>60660532
>>going out of your way to listen to music you don't like to "perfect" your curve
>I really don't get why people do this.

Autism.
>>
>>60660519
>what are compilations
calm down /bleep/ you're gonna have a stroke
>>
>>60660519
Rating singles is dumb as shit. A track is just lost without a context (the album that is)

For example some spoken word could be great in like a Swans album or something but separately it's not.
>>
>>60660532
I cannot even describe how fucking stupid and ignorant you are. You seriously think all singles are contained in albums >>60660555 and compilations? THE OPPOSITE IS FUCKING TRUE, THE VAST, VAST, VAST MAJORITY OF SINGLES ARE JUST FUCKING SINGLES, YOU STUPID FUCKS. HOW FUCKING NEW TO MUSIC ARE YOU? DID YOU START LISTENING TO MUSIC LAST YEAR?

I KNOW FOR A FUCKING FACT THAT YOU HAVE NO EXPLORED BEYOND THE MUCORE ESSENTIALS, SCARUFFI/FANTANO PICKS, AND TOP CHARTS. YOU STUPID, NEWFAG, SHITTERS.

I FUCKING HATE IDIOTS WHO ONLY LISTEN TO POP/ROCK, HOLY FUCK, ABSOLUTELY DISGUSTING.

DECADES OF FUCKING MUSIC

DECADES

YOU FUCKING RETARDS

YOU HAVE SHIT TASTE, AND YOU KNOW NOTHING ABOUT MUSIC.

FUCKING

KILL

YOURSELF
>>
My curve's peak is 3.5 because .5 is too brutal. Even a 1 is pushing it. There isn't an overwhelming amount of music I just say "Jesus, this should not exist it is so bad". Sure, music may sound bad, but 9 times out of 10, there is artistic value within that.

It is rare that music is a .5/5
>>
File: Wew Lad 2.png (88 KB, 283x281) Image search: [Google]
Wew Lad 2.png
88 KB, 283x281
>>60660580
>The only exception is if it is a EP length Single release, or it's not on an album
Calm the fuck down.
>>
>>60660557
Of fucking course you're relating this shit to fucking SWANS, a /mu/core band. Do yourself a favor and explore music beyond rock. Beyond albums. Seriously.
>>
>>60660580
>mfw albums will continue to be the reigning format long after this guy is dead in the ground
>>
>>60660580
it's... it's beautiful.
>>
/r/ing OP's profile
>>
>>60660600
"Reigning format" is ROCK MUSIC YOU FUCKING PLEBEIAN MUCORE DRONE FUCKING RETARD HOLY SHIT I KNOW FOR A FACT YOU WOULD HAVE LESS THAN 1,000 RATINGS IF YOU MADE A RYM BECAUSE YOU'RE LITERALLY SEVENTEEN YEARS OLD AND STARTED LISTENING TO MUSIC ONE OR TWO YEARS AGO AND YOUR FAVORITE "BANDS" INCLUDE ANIMAL COLLECTIVE AND DEATH GRIPS FUCKING KILL YOURSELF
>>
>>60660619
*in rock music
>>
>>60660594
Exception? The exception is the rare case when it's from a fucking album. That is not the majority of the time, and you'd know that if you weren't a mucore drone retard. Half of my library is pure singles that aren't from albums, and that's tens of thousands of songs. Dumb cunt.
>>
>>60660385
(Different person) Well I don't think something should be rated as perfect if there could be a future thing that's better than it. BUT, If you're rounding (which you are on this scale) then it's reasonable to have perfects.
>>
File: curb.jpg (77 KB, 1379x546) Image search: [Google]
curb.jpg
77 KB, 1379x546
https://rateyourmusic.com/~BurstingFlares
>>
File: PrtSc_001.jpg (39 KB, 1030x361) Image search: [Google]
PrtSc_001.jpg
39 KB, 1030x361
Do you all rate after your first listen, or after 2 ou 3 songs, or all of you are listening things you don't like all the time?
>>
File: sdfsdfsdf.jpg (102 KB, 1337x581) Image search: [Google]
sdfsdfsdf.jpg
102 KB, 1337x581
I think rating bad music properly is harder than rating good one, because all the albums I like I listened too several times.
Who wants to go through something he hated on first listen again just to see if it maybe is not as bad as you thought.
>>
>>60660619
>>60660580
so basically what you're trying to say is that you don't like rock?
>>
File: image.jpg (66 KB, 758x640) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
66 KB, 758x640
>>60660295
>mfw new 10/10 on Thanksgiving

What a comfy holiday

https://rateyourmusic.com/~Prismadoll
>>
>>60660580
take a xanax or something faggot
>>
>>60660580
ayy la mao
>>
>>60660837
talk talk were great from beginning to end.
>>
>>60660580
...and I skim through this thread and see this

yikes
>>
File: special doggo.png (169 KB, 480x679) Image search: [Google]
special doggo.png
169 KB, 480x679
>>60660580
mmmm ebin pasta es muy bien meme
>>
File: 1447793851825.jpg (14 KB, 480x343) Image search: [Google]
1447793851825.jpg
14 KB, 480x343
>>60660580
Are you gonna be okay man?
>>
File: 1374731163826.gif (2 MB, 220x124) Image search: [Google]
1374731163826.gif
2 MB, 220x124
>>60660580
>>
literally who cares about rating systems
http://rateyourmusic.com/~tttc
>>
File: 1332629068335.jpg (71 KB, 474x595) Image search: [Google]
1332629068335.jpg
71 KB, 474x595
>>60660837
>>
>>60660580
>>
File: 1398819626165.jpg (103 KB, 677x609) Image search: [Google]
1398819626165.jpg
103 KB, 677x609
>>60660580
ayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy lmaoooo
>>
>>60660295
>>60660342
>>60660352
>>60660777
>>60660785
>>60660837
all male posters.
>>
>>60661636
I mean, yeah. I don't get what your point is though.
>>
>>60661636
and?
>>
>>60661636
what does this have to do with anything
>>
>>60661647
>>60661651
>>60661653
I was just checking if our profiling software works.
>>
File: 1394400984487.png (248 KB, 449x500) Image search: [Google]
1394400984487.png
248 KB, 449x500
>>60661669
What?
>>
>>60661669
what the fuck does that even mean
>>
>>60660580
Please don't have a heart attack, we need you to say more shit like this.
>>
>>60660457
>going out of your way to listen to music you don't like to "perfect" your curve
That so fucking much. If you have a perfect curve you're probably a retard.
>>
>>60660619
I feel like your projecting yourself at some previous point in your life.
>>
>>60661739
quit samefagging
>>
>>60660619
>implying an artist is bad because it is "entry level"

kill yourself
>>
>>60661775
> quit samefagging
That was literally my first post on /mu/
>>
File: wew.png (24 KB, 574x284) Image search: [Google]
wew.png
24 KB, 574x284
I just like music ok?
>>
File: Swans are my jam.jpg (29 KB, 560x420) Image search: [Google]
Swans are my jam.jpg
29 KB, 560x420
>>60661829

no
>>
File: indeks.jpg (7 KB, 207x243) Image search: [Google]
indeks.jpg
7 KB, 207x243
>>60661835
ok, im out of here now
>>
>>60661775
>quit samefagging
That was literally my first post on the internet
>>
File: curves.png (39 KB, 1179x737) Image search: [Google]
curves.png
39 KB, 1179x737
>>60661829
it's okay anon. how do you have more 0.5 than 1.0 tho?
>>
File: image.jpg (78 KB, 960x640) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
78 KB, 960x640
Hoarding hard, still i could dream about few thousands ratings :(
>>
File: 1448706627244.png (10 KB, 480x480) Image search: [Google]
1448706627244.png
10 KB, 480x480
>>60661888
Quit samefagging
>>
>>60661985
>Quit samefagging
Quit samefagging
>>
>>60661991
Fuck, well played, I've got nothing
>>
>>60661902
i just started so it still has to even out, probably the curve looks like that because i rated alot of my favorite classics after i created my account and didn't really care to rate albums i didn't like
>>
>>60662065

Samefag much?
>>
>>60662065
>>60662093
Stop samefagging
>>
>>60662093
Oh don't you start, too
>>
>>60660580
ty for this post f am
>>
File: RymCurve.jpg (43 KB, 764x433) Image search: [Google]
RymCurve.jpg
43 KB, 764x433
>>
File: scr.png (33 KB, 713x536) Image search: [Google]
scr.png
33 KB, 713x536
okay then..
>>
>>60660325
rym
>>
>>60660519
>mfw you're right but nobody gives a fuck
>>
File: RYM curve.png (34 KB, 1389x390) Image search: [Google]
RYM curve.png
34 KB, 1389x390
>>60660777
idk man I think it's their autism

>>60662576
nice meme
>>
>>60660580
this guy is saying the truth. basically he is saying that there are tons of artists that have only released couple of singles and no albums.
>>
File: lBEId[1].png (6 KB, 916x279) Image search: [Google]
lBEId[1].png
6 KB, 916x279
this whole "listening to music you don't like to 'perfect your curve'" meme must die. it is impossible to know whether you will like something or not before you listen to it. if you say shit like this then you clearly brainwashed into thinking that music taste is not subjective. get your shit together /mu/
>>
>>60662704

people who say this listen to the same 20 artists they always did plus p4k and fatano apporved music so it works for them
>>
>>60660295
62 384 albums * 40 minutes = 2495360 minutes = 41589 hours = 1733 days = 4,7 years of non stop listening to music

i dont think so m80

>inb4 but you can also rate singluhs and eps
>>
>>60662736
did you really think saying ">inb4 but you can also rate singulhs and eps" soundly refuted the possibility that singles and EPs make up a decent proportion of that guy's library? dumbass.

>>60662732
yea it's almost always a /mu/drone sorta mentality. sad.
>>
>>60660557
You little faggot rockist, there are millions of artists that never released any album.
>>
>>60662704
>it is impossible to know whether you will like something or not before you listen to it.

You've never found a blog or a critic you tend to agree with? If something comes recommended by someone I trust, it'll probably be the sort of thing I like. I don't just pick albums out at random, I have prior knowledge.
>>
>>60662771
wanna hit this joint ?

captcha: hillside lane
>>
>>60660580
totally agree with you. these people that listen to only albums are mssing tons of stuff.
>>
>>60662771
there's a lot of music out there that isn't worth listening to
>>
>>60662765
cry more you autistic fedora gentleman
>>
Why would music follow a normal distribution anyway? Bad albums are more common than good albums. A weibull distribution (k<1) seems more appropriate.
>>
>>60662704
No of course not but for example my favourite genre is Black Metal, and particularly BM from Poland tends to be pretty good as of late. Now on the other hand I know that the few contemp. R&B albums that I have listened to weren't really my cup of tea. So when I listen to a new BM album from Poland I might hate it but the odds are much smaller than for a new Cont. R&B album
>>
>>60662783
well i mean, no, i haven't lol. most of my music discovery is done at complete random or by looking through labels i enjoy. or by searching through tags on what.cd or looking through RYM or if i want to get into a specific genre i'll usually ask a friend for help. that's pretty much it.

>>60662792
don't get mad because you're underage
>>
File: 1447454365525.png (269 KB, 567x960) Image search: [Google]
1447454365525.png
269 KB, 567x960
>>60662783
>You've never found a blog or a critic you tend to agree with?

Saying this you are confirming his point.
>>
>>60662819
yeah genres you dislike are a different case. do you like any r&b to begin with though?
>>
>>60662820
>actually defending rating singles
filtered
>>
>>60662820
>by looking through labels i enjoy

This is the same thing though. If you like a label, you tend to agree with however they're signing and what they're pushing. You're still taking recommendations, which favors the albums that you'd prefer.
>>
>>60662836
None that I have heard so far but I haven't given up on the genre yet since I have only listened to like ten releases or something. My point is that the vast majority of all albums I listen to come from genres that I tend to like and only a minority from genres that I usually dislike, which explains why my rating curve has an average above 2.5
>>
File: french_rym_279_ratings.png (3 KB, 208x125) Image search: [Google]
french_rym_279_ratings.png
3 KB, 208x125
>>
>>60662841
i understand your point but i think it's a bit different. most people on /mu/ don't have favorite labels and favorite music niches to sit down and be comfortable with and they don't do any outside exploring whatsoever, or at least that's what it seems like to me.

>>60662839
poor lonely child...

>>60662861
problem is, listening to music from genres you like is only a small narrower in finding everything that you'll potentially like/like. i mean i love trip hop but god knows i've heard many shitty trip hop albums lol. it's all about figuring out what you look for in music, but at the same time it is best to keep an open mind as much as possible.
>>
>>60660457
>>60660542
What? How else are you supposed to find new music that you actually like. Someone recommends an album on /mu/ for example, or RYM's recommendation system, I download it and give it a listen but don't like it. That has happened to me many times.
>>
>>60662940
if you find that those outlets aren't usually good for you, then don't rely on them lol. how do you usually discover music?
>>
File: ratings; 1289.png (34 KB, 922x362) Image search: [Google]
ratings; 1289.png
34 KB, 922x362
>>60660457
>having more than five 5 stars
irl I have no 5 stars, I just do it this way on RYM so I can highlight the albums I like.
In my real ratings, my 5 stars are 4.5 stars, and my 4.5 stars are 4 stars, 4 stars are still 4 stars and everything else is the same.
>>
>>60662935
Well yeah that's why I don't just listen to Black Metal all day. Like I guess 80% of all new albums I listen to are from genres I like, while around 20% are from genres I don't like/know. Sure the system is far from perfect but it's impossible to find everything that you will potentially like anyway. It's all about maximizing the odds
>>
File: 22.jpg (57 KB, 540x960) Image search: [Google]
22.jpg
57 KB, 540x960
>>60662964
>irl I have no 5 stars, I just do it this way on RYM so I can highlight the albums I like.
>In my real ratings, my 5 stars are 4.5 stars, and my 4.5 stars are 4 stars, 4 stars are still 4 stars and everything else is the same.

HUH
>>
>>60662953
The very same way.
>>
>>60662973
yeah you got it dude

>>60663026
hmmmm would you like some help discovering good music
>>
>>60662964
>I mainly listen to music I rate 2/5
nice
>>
>>60662994
>HUH
What did he mean by this?
>>
>>60663033
>hmmmm would you like some help discovering good music
Gladly. I never said I don't discover good music using /mu/ or RYM though.
>>
>>60663059
https://rateyourmusic.com/collection/Hesjz/r5.0
>>
Rate
>>
>>60660295
>assigning a numeric score to works of art
How is this still a thing?
>>
>>60664015
>not getting that "how much I like something" =! objective evaluation of it's worth
>>
File: curve.jpg (55 KB, 716x521) Image search: [Google]
curve.jpg
55 KB, 716x521
Am I OK?
>>
>>60660457
You are retarded
>>
Everyone post their RYM 5.0 albums
>>
>rating music

Daily reminder that if you have an rym you are literally just as bad as the p4k/scaruffi/fantanos that you make fun of for being pleb
>>
>>60660341
who is he?
>>
>>60665905
https://rateyourmusic.com/collection/firechao/r5.0
never doubt my choice of /mu/core
>>
>>60660352
Pretty solid. I need to hop on the RYM train
>>
>>60660580
singles suck ass m8. Just take the time to listen to the full album
>>
>>60660475
Nothing.
I have a decent amount of 5 stars because I look at music in its respective genre and not as a whole
>>
>>60665996
fuck me, all are shit man wtf
>>
>>60660580
cook up that pasta mom
>>
RYM is one of the most autisitc sites on the internet
And this thread is more proof of that
>>
>>60665905
https://rateyourmusic.com/collection/bashkukk/r5.0
>>
>>60666090
>fuck me
seconded
>>
>>60660580
Wait till r/4chan gets a load of this, it's gonna be epic. Upvotes, here I come!
>>
File: TmTiJnN.png (41 KB, 1382x354) Image search: [Google]
TmTiJnN.png
41 KB, 1382x354
https://rateyourmusic.com/~nvicente
>>
>>60665905
https://rateyourmusic.com/collection/Prismadoll/r5.0
>>
File: rym5s.png (94 KB, 645x503) Image search: [Google]
rym5s.png
94 KB, 645x503
>>60665905
Woo hoo!
>>
>>60666274
good curve, I can tell you're not an autistic dweeb
>>
>having no opinions so you give almost everything 3.0+
>thinking you are better than anyone else
>>
>>60660532 #
I cannot even describe how fucking stupid and ignorant you are. You seriously think all singles are contained in albums >>60660555 # and compilations? THE OPPOSITE IS FUCKING TRUE, THE VAST, VAST, VAST MAJORITY OF SINGLES ARE JUST FUCKING SINGLES, YOU STUPID FUCKS. HOW FUCKING NEW TO MUSIC ARE YOU? DID YOU START LISTENING TO MUSIC LAST YEAR?

I KNOW FOR A FUCKING FACT THAT YOU HAVE NO EXPLORED BEYOND THE MUCORE ESSENTIALS, SCARUFFI/FANTANO PICKS, AND TOP CHARTS. YOU STUPID, NEWFAG, SHITTERS.

I FUCKING HATE IDIOTS WHO ONLY LISTEN TO POP/ROCK, HOLY FUCK, ABSOLUTELY DISGUSTING.

DECADES OF FUCKING MUSIC

DECADES

YOU FUCKING RETARDS

YOU HAVE SHIT TASTE, AND YOU KNOW NOTHING ABOUT MUSIC.

FUCKING

KILL

YOURSELF
>>
>>60666632
wew
>>
>>60666632
I cannot even describe how fucking stupid and ignorant you are. You seriously think all singles are contained in albums >>60660555 and compilations? THE OPPOSITE IS FUCKING TRUE, THE VAST, VAST, VAST MAJORITY OF SINGLES ARE JUST FUCKING SINGLES, YOU STUPID FUCKS. HOW FUCKING NEW TO MUSIC ARE YOU? DID YOU START LISTENING TO MUSIC LAST YEAR?

I KNOW FOR A FUCKING FACT THAT YOU HAVE NO EXPLORED BEYOND THE MUCORE ESSENTIALS, SCARUFFI/FANTANO PICKS, AND TOP CHARTS. YOU STUPID, NEWFAG, SHITTERS.

I FUCKING HATE IDIOTS WHO ONLY LISTEN TO POP/ROCK, HOLY FUCK, ABSOLUTELY DISGUSTING.

DECADES OF FUCKING MUSIC

DECADES

YOU FUCKING RETARDS

YOU HAVE SHIT TASTE, AND YOU KNOW NOTHING ABOUT MUSIC.

FUCKING

KILL

YOURSELF
>>
File: screwyouimacat.gif (1015 KB, 245x220) Image search: [Google]
screwyouimacat.gif
1015 KB, 245x220
what the hell is happening in this thread?
>>
>>60661751
yes but you can't know how good an album is until you listen to it therefore the statement is flawed
>>
>>60666949
No you can't know how much you will like it but you can guess how much. When I first listen to an album I can usually guess how much I will like it. I am rarely completely wrong
>>
>>60665927
Verkrah
Thread replies: 140
Thread images: 38

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.