>genre: postpunk
>album is released in 1971
Somebody fucked up the tags, oh well.
>genre: postpunk
>album is released past the 80s
>>60648914
Are you mentally deficient?
>>60648736
>>60648990
No he means that post-punk after the 80s sucks
>>60649033
Nice digits. And alright, my mistake. But not all of it is bad. Most all of it is incredibly derivative. But that isn't necessarily a bad thing so long as the execution is at least competent. It isn't exactly true to the spirit of post-punk but whatever.
>>60649133
Its too late for apologies now, you need to pay the price.
>>60649133
>But not all of it is bad
for example?
>>60649184
Interpol
>>60649133
>the spirit of post-punk
What would that be?
>>60649179
>1978
>>60649005
Does minimal rock even exist?
>>60649203
LOL
>>60649203
you straight up walked into that one m8
>>60648990
>he thinks there exists actual post-punk made past the 80s
The only thing that gets a pass are bands from that era making new stuff.
It's really just a product of its time. Post-punk is more of an era than a legit genre.
It's like, how could something made in the 10s be regarded as some kind of followup or conclusion to the 70s punk movement? It's silly.
>>60649440
That's why the genre is called post-punk REVIVAL.
>partially recorded before punk
>released after punk
Is this the only record that could be defined as proto-post-punk?
>>60649474
>post-punk revival
like what bands?
I bet neither of them have released anything as good as Metal Box or Deceit.
>>60649474
It's fucking retarded, it'd be like some garbage third wave post-rock bands claiming to be first wave revival just because they say so.
anyone got an post punk chart?
>>60649223
low - i could live in hope?
>>60649505
>I bet neither of them have released anything as good as Metal Box or Deceit.
Most trve post-punk bands haven't, though. Unfair comparison.
>>60649499
That's not a post-punk record, but Deceit is.
>>60649522
Enjoy yourself and don't forget there's a lot more than this. Just discovering the rest of the discographies of these bands is a ride in itself.
>>60649576
thank u anon
>>60649534
well yeah, can be considered minimal rock
>>60649576
>U2
every time
>>60649505
>>60649520
I'm not saying that those modern bands have released anything as good as some classic post-punk albums. To be honest the only good "post-punk revival band" is Interpol. Even they are not that good, because they have only one good album.
>>60649534
you could make an argument that slowcore is a subgenre of "minimal rock", which i doubt is a genre at all but more of a description
>>60649576
you should add some more dance punk in there like soulwax or lcd soundsystem, but nice chart anon
>>60649680
can u recommend some dance punk band?
>>60649680
I didn't make it, m8.
Also, those bands have no fucking business on a post-punk chart, get the fuck out of here.
>>60649698
Listen to industrial.
>>60649659
lot of slowcore isn't at all that minimal. even if it might be slow but there's lot of sound going on. ok, i know that drone, which is often loud might be also considered minimal in terms of composition, but i think that's not nessesarily the case in slo-co
idk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YsmvzBYo7Bc
>>60649698
no knife
that's not post-punk at all though
postpunk
>>60651645
"today i will" postpunk
post-thread
