would you guys like an 80s revival that actually had music with very good musicianship, memorable melodies and production instead of half assed meme 80s retroism done by hacks?
>>60551959
we could call it shazam
this will never happen sadly
>>60551989
Says who?
>>60552025
says logic. Musicianship has been on a decline the last couple of decades, nostalgia may be huge but its very surface level. It'd be nice to see but people are too dumb
>>60552117
{needs citation}
>>60553216
new technology has made good musicianship no longer a necessity
There's a lot of very quality 80s revival. But there's also a shitton of snorecore vaporwave / chillwave / synthwave / etc
>>60553327
that's what people who grew up with the 60s music said about 80s music
>>60551959
Not really, revivals are the sign of ideas coming to a screeching end. Instead we should abandon trying to sound "indie" and rero and progress to something "new."
>>60553392
Didn't people in the 80s complain that all the guitar virtuosos of the age were just wank?
nah
it's impossible to make retrowave that doesn't sound completely unrememberal and generic as fuck. com truise is literally the only exception i have ever come across
Musicianship hasn't declined but people seem to be using textures and musicianship as a substitute for songwriting, which is why so much retro 80s revival music sounds generic and shitty.
>>60553457
all virtuosos are just wank
>>60551959
>would you like bad music if it was good?
what an inane question
>>60553384
like who?
>>60551959
>implying 80s music wasn't already made by hacks
