Bold claim. What makes you say that?

You just discovered it, didn't you OP?
It loses it's charm after a while, but it's still fantastic.

>>60487842
I mean if you can name some other albums that have as much sophistication in their compositions as Song Cycle go on.

this should be /mu/core

>>60488026
It'd be a great coupling with TMR honestly.
Seems to be good pleb repellent.

>>60488026
This

>>60487813
It took me a few listens to 'get' it, but now I love it.

>>60488026
why
do you want people posting it 24/7 saying stuff like DUDE SO RANDOM LMAO like it happens with TMR?
is fucking annoying

>>60487813
Fuck off, Cameron.

>>60488116
I'd be fine with that it's fun exposing the TMR haters as idiots.

>>60488055
>>60488066
Really? I thought it was reasonably accessible. It just sounds beautiful which anyone can appreciate.

>>60488915
>I thought it was reasonably accessible.
it doesn't really have any form to the songs which throws a lot of people off

>those who actually purchased the album had likely worn their copies out by playing it over and over, and suggested that listeners send in worn out copies to Warner Bros. in return for two new copies, including one "to educate a friend with."

Impressive/admirable album, but it sounds like complete shit and doesn't actually have any meaning.

>>60489634
>but it sounds like complete shit and doesn't actually have any meaning.
explain