>using 'objectively' unironically
- Home
- Board: /mu/ - Music
- Reading: >using 'objectively' unironically
>using 'unironically' objectively
>>60322887
who is this spunk trunk
>using 'pretentious' unironically
>>60322929
use google image search you fucking gringo
>using 'boring' unironically
>>60322929
a forced reaction image meme
>>60322990
>implying it isn't baka desu tier
I think objective should be used very sparingly when talking about music. It's really only something that can be applied to complexity of music or the range and skill of a vocalist. It's even wicked iffy in those departments.
>>60323022
it's dumb because you're the only person who posts them baka
>>60322954
>pretending "ironically"
Wow you guys really like shitposting huh. I'm literally the only one here trying to have a conversation
>>60323141
what do you want to talk about?
>>60322835
>using "subjectively" ironically
>>60323151
I was trying to make a conversation out of Op's post.
>>60323034
>>60323141
OP, here. Let's a have a good conversation, anon. Pick a topic and let's be nice to each other. Memes aren't allowed.
>>60323293
Do you think objective is ever useful when talkign about music?
>>60322835
>spongebob memes
millenials we out there emoji amirite?
>>60323497
>going on 4chan and mocking people for being in their mid 20's
>>60323464
I actually do not have an opinion about that. In one hand, I know music is an art expression and it's submitted to the listener's subjectivity. In the other hand, sometimes I am convinced that some albums may be 'objectively' rated as good or bad. What do you think? Can you hate a piece of art even knowing that is brilliant? Let me know.
This thread was moved to >>>/trash/96780
