>believing that the beatles are better than the beach boys
>Believing The Beach Boys have more than one and a half good albums
ayy lmao
>>59684796
the beach boys were good, but they were only great for a few records out of their discography, a lot is just trash
whereas the beatles entire output is fantastic
>>59684796
this
>>59684853
>the beatles entire output is fantastic
They were literally One Direction until Revolver.
They are both shit tbh
>>59684928
liking the beatles past revolver but hating them before just shows that you're a shitty music listener who only believes what he's told to. there's nothing wrong with disliking the beatles, but claiming their older stuff was bad when it was also pop songwriting of nearly the same quality and execution, just in a different style, is idiotic. try thinking for yourself
>>59684928
>They were literally One Direction
then the Beach Boys were 5SOS
>Listening to music for teenage girls in the 70s.
At least the beatles actually wrote good songs and went beyond shitty pop music
>>59684928
Would you suck Kanye West's dick?
>>59684928
Not true
Beat music is actually significant though. The Beatles (and the Beach Boys for their surf sound, vocal harmonies) deserve a special place in the history of 1960's music
>>59684928
>>59684928
>implying one direction is bad
lewronggeneration xD
