Post some 90-100 bpm tracks
- Home
- Board: /mu/ - Music
- Reading: Post some 90-100 bpm tracks
Post some 90-100 bpm tracks
>>54034120
she's so qt, it hurts
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z6kky3k-MVk
>>54034120
who the fuck remembers the fucking bpm of a track you goddamn retard???? who the fuck even cares about the bpm??
i hope you die in a car crash idiot
>>54034217
Sorry
https://songbpm.com
This will help you
>>54034217
DJs
Conductors
Musicians
:^)
>>54034217
Fuck that guy.
Here ya go, OP. Don't be turned off by the title.
https://soundcloud.com/twrk/mti-twrk-remix
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4HdPQLJi7gY
>>54034120
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xiCEzJIDpwU
>implying you don't feel like a serial killer in some sort of rainy dystopian neotokyo surrounded by people in animal masks on a subway
>>54034276
conductors and musicians won't care about the bpm either.
classically trained musicians will care about the tempo but they'll never say talk about the bpm of a piece unless it's something incredibly specific (which is rare as fuck). and jazz musicians won't care about bpm either since it's all about feel in jazz.
djs are scum
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vS_QgQxlNJ0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9y-wFA3yY28
>>54034361
>musicians won't care about the bpm either.
What if they wrote the piece?
>djs are scum
What makes you say that?
>>54034529
no one thinks about the fucking exact bpm when writing a piece. unless you're a stuck up faggot you'll give the piece a tempo ranking (largo, andante, presto, etc.).
>>54034626
Depends what sort of music you're composing. Electronic music for example often demands an exact BPM due to the nature of its production process, unless you're writing something more loosely structured such as ambient or electroacoustic music.
>>54034754
>Electronic
>Music
>>54034825
I feel like hating on electronic music as a whole is much more fedora-tipper-esque.
>>54034825
Nice.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wyAroQKom6E
This song is 90 bpm.
pic unrelated
