Archived threads in /mu/ - Music - 1453. page
- Home
- Board: /mu/ - Music
- Reading: Archived threads in /mu/ - Music - 1453. page
>using lastfm
>cute teenage Russian goth girl keeps private messaging me
>she's even sending me smiley faces
Is this it /mu/? Is this what having a gf is like?
yes
you will be married within a fortnight
I mean you've pretty much fucked her
ANON GET AWAY FROM THAT UNCLEAN DICK TRAP
FUCK MEN TO STAY PURE
WOKE UP QUICK, AT ABOUT NOON
JUST THOUGHT THAT I HAD TO BE IN COMPTON SOON
YOU'RE LIVING IN A FANTSY
DRINKIN GASOLINE N SHIT
dame E
I've been sleeping for too long
Eh, I didn't like it
>>64715157
do you like DG in general?
THE TABLES HAVE SWITCHED NOW WE GOT ALL THE COCONUTS BITCH
Absolutely nothing
[spoiler]a[/spoiler]nothing
The flow
5 months into 2016, post your current pick for AOTY
runner up:
james blake - the colour in anything
tfw best 3 albums of the year were released on one weekend
>>64714867
Pic related is /thread
I don't really care for any of their other stuff either, so this was pretty surprising.
why does /mu/ not like Octavarium?
because astonishing was my introduction to them and while its aoty I dont really like it enough to explore their discography
I was more intrigued to go back through the discography of fleshgod apocalypse who I was also introduced to this year
>>64714722
Listen to Images and words nigger its not that long and wanky as the others.
and its so good you don't want to miss it.
Because you have to be 18 or older to use this site.
rape who?
>>64714679
DO IT, YA FAGGOT
ITT: bends that only fcukiing retardeds like
>>64714577
i LOVE Atoms for Peace
>>64714577
not even trying.
hurr karmar polise
is like the beetles of music omfg
Just finished marathoning this album...did I like it?
im waiting for the reviews
I hate this board
>marathoning this album
how long have people been saying this
post godly lines from yorke
>>64714394
>A LEEEEEEEEEEEEMOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN
>EVERYTHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIINNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNGGG
changed my life from that point on honestly
> Ice age coming
> We're not scaremongering
> This is really happening
>I slipped away
>I slipped on a little white lie
>Where I end and where you start
>Where you, you left me alone
>You left me alone
BROKEN HEARTS, MAKE IT RAIN
AOTY
>>64714218
Thom make my soul yearn for isolation from this cruel unforgiving world that doesn't give a single fuck about you or anything you try to do
>>64714218
what song is this
nothing has really blown my mind so far and I'm just starting numbers
>>64714308
Sorry anon but its too late this album is not for you
Although try it from the beginning again maybe?
Is spork-rock the worst thing to happen to rock music?
sporkcore
>>64714157
Who's the band at the bottom?
>>64714185
STUMP! I can't believe this guy is really choosing Stump to pick on though, what an obscure choice of band to bring up. I love Stump honestly. screw OP
How in the fuck did pitchfork ever warrant giving this a 9.5. It's a mediocre at best album that was made by a band that would go on to be great. It would be like giving Pablo Honey a 9 just because Radiohead would go onto make some good albums. Is there something I'm missing?
>>64714122
a brain
>>64714195
/thread
>>64714122
Why yes. Yes there is. There is something you're totally missing, OP. But don't worry. You can make up for it by bragging to all the plebs and contrarians that you posted dubs on the first try. Mind you, this will not help you gain understanding and knowledge of why this is a great album, but it's better than nothing.
The fact that so many books still name the Beatles as "the greatest or most significant or most influential" rock band ever only tells you how far rock music still is from becoming a serious art. Jazz critics have long recognized that the greatest jazz musicians of all times are Duke Ellington and John Coltrane, who were not the most famous or richest or best sellers of their times, let alone of all times. Classical critics rank the highly controversial Beethoven over classical musicians who were highly popular in courts around Europe. Rock critics are still blinded by commercial success. The Beatles sold more than anyone else (not true, by the way), therefore they must have been the greatest. Jazz critics grow up listening to a lot of jazz music of the past, classical critics grow up listening to a lot of classical music of the past. Rock critics are often totally ignorant of the rock music of the past, they barely know the best sellers. No wonder they will think that the Beatles did anything worthy of being saved.
In a sense, the Beatles are emblematic of the status of rock criticism as a whole: too much attention paid to commercial phenomena (be it grunge or U2) and too little to the merits of real musicians. If somebody composes the most divine music but no major label picks him up and sells him around the world, a lot of rock critics will ignore him. If a major label picks up a musician who is as stereotyped as can be but launches her or him worldwide, your average critic will waste rivers of ink on her or him. This is the sad status of rock criticism: rock critics are basically publicists working for major labels, distributors and record stores. They simply highlight what product the music business wants to make money from.
Why are there age limits? why is it illegal to marry a 12-year old? Helen of Troy was 12. Juliet and Cleopatra were still teenagers when they became famous. Most heroines of classic novels and poems were underage by today's laws. Medical studies show that the best age for a woman to have children is between 15 and 25 (lowest chances of miscarriage, of birth defects and, last but not least, of the woman dying while giving birth); while the worst age is after the mid 30s. And the younger you are, the more likely you are to cement a real friendship with your children; the older you are, the more likely that the "generational gap" will hurt your children's psychology. Therefore it is much more natural to have a child at 16 than at 40. In countless countries of the world women have their first child at a very young age, and stop having children at a relatively young age. Nonetheless, in the USA it is illegal to have sex before 18 (but, note, only if the partner is over 18, which is like saying that it is ok to rob a bank if you are a banker), while it is perfectly legal to get pregnant at 40 or (thanks to medical progress) even at 70.
Note that all of these forms of marriage were common in ancient times before the introduction of Christian "morality" (Islam, which came after Christianity, still allows them). Therefore one could find stronger arguments in favor of these forms of marriage than in favor of homosexual marriage (which has been relatively rare throughout the centuries and is persecuted in just about every society of the world).
Today incest is illegal, but it was common in ancient times (all kings and queens of Egypt married their siblings or mothers): why is it illegal for two siblings to get married and why does incest disqualify a couple from adopting children?
>>64713988
And, if we expand the definition of marriage to all of these categories, what rights do we give them? For example, to me it looks much more natural for a group of two men and three women to raise children (as it was in most ancestral societies) than for a same-sex couple to do so (something for which i find no precedents in ancestral societies). A family without a man or without a woman goes against biology, and probably has psychological consequences for which the entire society will have to pay.
>>64713988
These are some pretty compelling arguments.
can i get a safe download link?
>>64713912
bump
>>64713912
Sent! :^)
FLAC
https://mega.nz/#!lt53DS4I!Z89HQpuArJlCKeSlF_DwGd1IFiLj1KIgfQIxN5qhvMw
320
https://mega.nz/#!JtgiVBLK!_ZOHcme4t_1-yPthQEanD_nv_n-DDikOm94xke0CnSQ
V0
https://mega.nz/#!Ulp0iZTB!L6pzZ6BVMDacoJtWp2dFvv4AoZFzcaG3YcpGTG2mIyg
