Where does the VF-2SS's gunpod go when in fighter mode?
>>13967898
nobody?
Is there even a single picture on the internet depicting where it is (or where it's supposed to go?)
>>13967898
Hint for you
>>13967959
>>13967932
>>13967898
>sexiest Valkyrie ever made
>not designed by Kawamori
kek
>>13972064
>sexiest valkyrie
The only cool thing about it is the railgun
>>13972064
Slight variation on the VF-1, big deal.
>>13967963
Why does the VF-2 look so shit in fighter mode? It looks like it's going to fall apart at any moment.
>>13972064
>a bootleg VF-1
>sexy
top keks
VF-XS Valkyrie II
>>13973179
>>13973190
>>13972541
>>13972547
VF-2SS stands for SuperSexy
>>13972616
>Why does the VF-2 look so shit in fighter mode? It looks like it's going to fall apart at any moment.
You are looking at a horribly designed toy, the actual design for M2 is different .
>>13973336
Super Shitty*
>>13973739
That would be your taste, senpai.
>>13972064
You're telling me the Nightmare family was designed by someone else?!
>>13975067
>warping legs valk
>sexiest VF
kek
>>13973739
>Super Shitty*
Ah we have found a kawamori-fag. You can detect them just like that. Crawl back under kawamori's ass.
Can we just discuss the kawaii-as-fuck VF-5000 Star Mirage?
My fav Valk, the only thing that bugs me is the green canopy.
>>13978796
Safely one of the Top 3 Valkyries.
>>13978839
middle one is the best
>>13978839
It looks really out of place.
>>13978796
Not even close to the original lineart.
>>13978839
There's a Hikaru colors VF19?
>>13980745
The VF2 definitely doesn't look like a military aircraft, more like a civilian hobby plane or trainer.
>>13975067
Ignoring VF-17 being mechanically impossible transformationwise, the 171 is sex
>>13981366
I kind of agree. The cockpit looks too gracile for something that is supposed handle military wear and tear. The pilot almost seems exposed compared to the other designs. The extremely long nose landing gear also doesn't look like the robust kind of gear you need to make carrier landings.
>>13981366
The YF-19 always had those colors...
>>13978839
Remove VF-2. It's notcanonanyway.
>>13982286
Remove yourself.
YF-0 masterrace
>>13982286
Canon =/= good design
Look at what you posted for example.
I like the VF-2, it's like a weird love child of the VF-4 and VF-1YF-21/VF-22 are best Valks though
>>13983081
>Lightning III
>Major Roy FockerCurse you Pineapple
>>13983094
>tfw
>>13983205
FuckingMk II pineapple
>>13975568
No, but you can have this hot-as-hell VF-3000 Crusader.
>>13983276
>That crooked nose
>>13983276
I know the crusader's hot and all, but dat UNS Glaug doh.
>>13983284
VF-1 nose was a little crooked too senpai
in ur butt
>>13983079
The VF-25 actually looks like it could fly unlike the cluster fuck that is the VF-2.
>>13988258
VF-2 is transformable spacecraft able of atmospheric flight.
VF-25 is transformable plane able of space-faring.
That's all there is to it.
You disliking its design is irrelevant.
>>13982276
>I kind of agree. [b]The cockpit looks too gracile for something that is supposed handle military wear and tear[/b]. [b]The pilot almost seems exposed[/b] compared to the other designs. The extremely long nose landing gear also doesn't look like the robust kind of gear you need to make carrier landings.
F-16 says hello.
Carrier landings in Macross ? Lol lol lol. Have you ever seen a Valkyrie with a tail hook ? Yeah I though so.
>>13989890
they do it in sdf
>>13989890
>Have you ever seen a Valkyrie with a tail hook ? Yeah I though so.
>>13989890
VF-0 has a tail hook.
>>13989943
>>13989960
VF-0 can't into space
>>13990658
And? What does that have to do with the original question? Just shut up now.
>>13988258
VF-2 Icarus. It could fly by the name only.
Still the best