What has been seen,
Can not be unseen.
>>13676574
nigger I've been fapping to mighty ducks porn ever since I've seen those helemts
>>13676574
Good thing I haven't watched that trash fanfanction yet
inb4 the TFA defense force arrives
>>13676595
>casts bait
>marvels at the arrival of fish
I envy your deft touch.
>>13676599
Wow that was fast. Tell me how much is Disney paying you guys?
>>13676606
how much is Universal paying you?
>>13676595
>We hate George Lucas! I wanna gun his whole faggot family down in the street!
>Waaaah, this one isn't made by George Lucas!
Star Wars babies, everyone.
>>13676595
I'll take it over the trash that is the prequels frankly. It doesn't matter if it's fanfiction, only if it's good. And TFA is better than the prequels.
>>13676608
Nothing, you don't need money to have common sense.
>>13676611
>people criticize TFA for being an absolute piece of shit riding on nostalgia and Disney money
>Waaah you're just a hater waaah why won't you like the movie waaah
TFA defense force, everyone.
>>13676620
You just said you haven't watched the movie.
Neither have I, by the way. Which I why I question why you think you're in a position to judge it. What has you so irrationally mad?
>>13676615
Good? Hahahaha!
Even the prequels are better than the soulless fanfiction that is TFA.
>>13676634
>Good thing I haven't watched
>>13676630
>You just said you haven't watched the movie.
I won't waste my money on that piece of shit.
>I question why you think you're in a position to judge it
1. I'm not a Disney shill
2. I have common sense
3. I'm not part of the TFA defense force
>>13676638
People who payed to watch that polished turd are complete idiots.
>20:04:38
>20:05:38
How bout that?
>>13676652
You say that implying those two posts are any different.
>>13676658
That's literally the opposite of what I implied.
>>13676608
>>13676595
here you go
>>13676675
>yfw Trevorrow was Disney's inside guy all along.
>>13676857
You brokoro my kokoro, Aniki.
>>13676851
>hurr durr le bait
Where do you get your replies, reddit?
That wouldn't be a surprise since the TFA defense force is obviously reddit-tier retarded.
>>13676574
Get a fucking job and stop wasting your time on the internet with this dumb shit.
I swear, the internet is filling up with more and more dumb shit hoping teenagers and general retards will make it viral
>>13676907
<see
>>13676927
>the internet is filling up with more and more dumb shit hoping teenagers and general retards will make it viral
So the average TFA fan?
>>13676620
>people criticize TFA for being an absolute piece of shit riding on nostalgia and Disney money
/tv/ is the minority. People don't criticize it. The hipsters over on reddi/tv/ do.
>>13677087
>criticizing a shit movie is being a hipster
Also I doubt those plebbits would say bad things about TFA, since that site is a huge circlejerk
>>13677102
Are you talking about /tv/ or reddit?
Eh, I suppose it doesn't matter - they're practically the same anyway.
>>13676927
OP here, I didn't post it hopeing it to go viral. Could care less. I didn't make it, I merely found it and posted it here to get a reaction.
I got one.
>>13676611
I was actually glad when I heard Lucas said "the fans will like it", because it implies he didn't, which meant I was going to enjoy the movie
>>13676574
Honestly, the biggest problem with the new storm trooper design isn't the duck face but the fact that they look like they have a cereal bowl on their head. That thing is waaaaaaaaay to round in shape.
>>13676595
It's sad that people think this is bait. The standards of /m/ have really plummeted.
>>13677712
Why have i started going to /o/
Hell anons there think this board is nice for some reason.
>>13676595
>implying its the only cannon fanfic tier starwars
Did you see the 3d cartoons.
>only people defending it hate the samurai jack 2d one
Buncha faggots i tell you.
Also anyone bothered by the fact stopping blasts from a blaster with the force is cannon now.
Is this the best memery this movie can deliver?
Bah, ONE QUARTER PORTION FOR YOU
>>13677741
Not even worth the effort. My old gundam memes catch more attention from everyone.
>>13676639
Must be a lot of money Universal is paying you.
>>13677741
nah this is the best meme from the movie.
>>13677175
>they're practically the same anyway
The same could be said for most of 4chan.
Like it or not, the same type of people frequent both sites.
>>13676585
Carl Barks would've loved it.
>>13677920
TRAITOR
>>13677741
I would've thought T-17.
>>13676574
Actually it reminds me of
>>13677740
>Did you see the 3d cartoons.
Rebels is actually good, faggot.
>only people defending it hate the samurai jack 2d one
Nice strawman, you gigantic fatass.
>>13677920
TR-8R
>>13677740
>Also anyone bothered by the fact stopping blasts from a blaster with the force is cannon now.
That has been a thing since ESB, faggot.
>>13678286
>expecting nostalgiafags to actually remember anything from their sacred cow
>>13678286
>>13678298
pretty sure it's vader's armor stopping the blaster shots. i know, it's stupid.
>>13678339
Ah yes, the thick armor plating on the palm of Vadee's glove.
>>13678339
Nowhere has that ever been stated.
Plus, if that were the case, that glove would be scorched right off and we'd be looking at a robot hand snagging Han's blaster.
and I say this as someone who is honestly fine with the mid-air blaster bolt catch. It's ridiculous, but as Jedi abilities go, there's been weirder
>>13676595
It's arguably better than VI and shits all over every PT movie.
>>13678415
Hahahaha, nice one.
Those Disney bucks sure are nice huh?
>>13678422
Fuck off back to /v/ you meme spewing tumor.
>>13678347
Blaster bolt catching was great. We are finally seeing some new uses for the Force. In previous movies it was nothing but lightsabers and throwing rocks.
>>13678422
Have fun being a faggot while 90% of the world is having fun with a great movie.
>>13678425
You fuck off back to reddit you disney shill
>>13678427
more like 30% which is influenced by 60% of disney shills
the movie sucks, and all who paid money to see it are idiot
>>13678442
God, fuck off, you sad sack of shit.
>>13678415
Definitely not better than VI and honestly not far off from the PT, which i find enjoyable anyway.
Unlike the PT, episode VII recycled a shit ton of its plot from IV
>>13678415
>It's arguably better than VI
Only if you don't know a thing about Kinography
>>13679318
Fuck off, Dr. Seuss.
>>13678347
The EU made up some shit saying that Vader's gloves were Mandalorian Crushgaunts that amplify his gripping strength by ten times and can reflect blaster bolts.
>>13677920
TRAITOR.This was indeed the best
>>13678426
I agree that was great.
Then he jobbed
>>13676574
I don't really see it. I mean, I can actually see what someone is on about when they point it out like the OP's picture, but if someone doesn't point it out it'd never occur to me, even when looking at them again afterwards. I just don't think it's that close a design cue and it really seems to be stretching to find similarity to me.
>>13679335
The EU also said that absorbing energy directly like Vader did with the blaster bolt was a rare Jedi skill and had Corran Horn be one of it's users, including absorbing the thermal energy from a hotspring or something to lift an ally from danger while he was still struggling to learn to use the Force.
>>13679318
What is kinography? Or do you mean cinematography and just trying to make it sound more fancy by using a bastardization of the latin origin for cinema (kinema = movement)? I went and looked it up having never come across the word before and all I got was a reddit thread, some deviantart shit, some blogs and so on and really nothing of note.
That said, I do actually think TFA has some decent cinematography. The opening shot of the Star Destroyer blocking out the planet before the TIEs fly out from under it's shadow is a good variation of Lucas' original Star Wars opening shot, the beam of light illuminating Han as he walks across the bridge to confront Ren is a fairly cliche shot but I think still works well there and there's a couple of other nice ones scattered throughout the film. Nothing terribly original, but still well utilized regardless.
>>13677920
TRAITOR
>>13679574
>I went and looked it up having never come across the word before and all I got was a reddit thread, some deviantart shit, some blogs and so on and really nothing of note.
lol so it's just one retard forcing jargon nobody needs?
>>13679622
I don't know, you tell me. Here's what Google says. 45, 000 results (a relatively tiny return for a Google search - cinematography has 25.7 million), the top result is a reddit page, followed pretty closely by a tumblr and a deviantart page. Seems pretty silly to me.
But then, maybe I'm just not cool enough to know what real kinography is? I don't discount that possibility.
>>13676595
> "Gosh, my opinion is so unpopular, how can I contend with the sheer number of people that'll refute it?"
> "I know, I'll call them a Defense Force!"
Nigga, I don't even disagree with you, and -I- cringed at that. Come on now.
>>13678173
Who in his right mind would want such a droid even for free
>>13679683
TR-8R is probably the droid equivalent of a Sith. You know he's name should be a dead give away, but he's just so highly placed or currently useful that you just can't do anything about it and have to work with him until that changes.
I could see Palpatine naming a droid that for instance.
>>13679664
The TFA defense force is real tho. Try saying anything bad about that shit movie then watch as its members acuse you of shitposting or baiting.
>>13680026
Try saying something good about it and watch as people disagree with you and talk about how terrible it is, often questioning your taste and in at least one case whether you're being paid to say it. That doesn't mean there's a TFA offense forice, it just means people have differing opinions on a thing. Because people always do. And the bigger and more popular thing is, the more impassioned those discussions are going to be.
>>13680026
You already said you didn't watch it.
>>13680026
>tho
>acuse
But you are shitposting
>>13679574
>Or do you mean cinematography and just trying to make it sound more fancy by using a bastardization of the latin origin for cinema (kinema = movement)?
Bang on.
>>13680057
>Try saying something good about it and watch as people disagree with you and talk about how terrible it is
HAHAHAHA no, just look up any TFA threads here on /m/ and you'll see.
This thread is a proof of how the TFADF acts.
>>13680063
See >>13676646
>>13680065
This post is proof of what I said.
>>13680100
People discuss it's flaws constantly in threads that start out with a focus on positive points. Also, they're right: if you haven't seen a thing you really have no right to judge it.
>>13680115
>if you haven't seen a thing you really have no right to judge it.
Oh but I am going to see it eventually, I just won't waste my money to do so. Meanwhile, I can spoil myself and read reviews not done by the TFADF so I can rightfully criticize it.
>>13680123
>>>/reddit/
>>13680132
Nice counterargument, who gave it to you, Disney or JarJar?
>>13680123
I don't know who's sadder - these invisible zealots flocking to this board and religiously defending this film as the best thing ever or a man dedicating his meager existence to despising a film he hasn't even seen and stroking his e-peen over it.
Oh, wait.
>>13680140
Nice try TDADF, at least Disney isn't paying me for what I'm saying.
>>13680123
> I can judge a film by reading summaries or other people's criticisms (so long as they fall in line with my pre-existing feelings on the film)
No, you can't. You can judge it after you've seen it for free, but saying that you know anything about it because you read some summaries and reviews or criticisms that already meet your existing biases is just silly.
>>13680149
Believe me, slick, if I was receiving that kind of money I wouldn't even deign to go here.
>>13680160
No idiot, when I said I read reviews not made by the TFADF, I meant reviews that just say "OMG THIS IS BEST MOVIE EVER GO WATCH IT NOW DISNEY I LOVE YOU".
Instead I read reviews that carefully analyze the movie, and by simple logic, they all reach the conclusion that the movie is a shitty fanfiction.
>>13680173
> all the reviews that are good all magically reach the same conclusion I already had
> good reviews always say it's shitty fanfiction, bad reviews always say OMG BEST MOVIE EVAR
It's almost like there's some kind of confirmation bias at play.
>>13680187
No, it's almost like there's reviews done by normal people, and reviews done by Disney shills such as yourself.
>>13680189
Okay, since you have shifted the burden of proof firmly onto yourself, enlighten the unwashed peons, hence - direct the masses to these reviews that uniformly decree that TFA is a 'shitty fanfiction', and that Abrams and his cohorts are as Lucifer was before the Almighty, rebels and heathens daring to desecrate the work of the master.
Please don't say 'just look', by the way, you'll be a massive fucking tool if you do.
>>13677740
>>13678339
No, its the Force. The novelization makes it clear and we see the same shit in AoTC and RoTS with Yoda catching and absorbing energy from both Dooku and Palpatine's Force Lightning.
The technique is named Tutamanis in EU.
>>13679335
No it didn't. The super Mandalorian crash-gauntlets was something Boba Fett upgraded to late in EU with his newest armor.
>>13680198
Awww, now the TFADF wants to be spoonfed?
Why won't you fuck off back to reddit already?
Or is Disney paying to shill TFA exclusively on /m/?
>>13680189
I haven't given a review here or even implied I've made one. Hell, I never even gave any comments or impressions on the film, only pointed out that you have an obvious confirmation bias and view everything through it.
>>13680236
And you lost.
>>13676611
Those are not nor have they ever been the same people.
>>13680236
>blah blah blah words words words look how superior I am as I jerk my mammoth internet cock
Yeah, don't know why I bothered. Piss up a rope.
>>13680246
Nice try Disney
>>13680259
Why are you so mad? Can't you accept that there are people outside of your TFA defense force?
>>13677920
TRAITOR
>>13680271
Now you're just trying too hard.
>Maybe if I tell them not to like thing hard enough, they'll stop liking thing.
>>13679335
>The Glove of Darth Vader was a Mandalorian Crushgaunt fitted around one of Lord Skere Kaan's indestructible Sith amulets
>>13680276
At least I'm not getting paid for what I'm posting.
>>13680281
>Maybe if I tell them to like thing hard enough, they'll start liking thing
ftfy
Er. Meant to reply to >>13679335 with >>13680290
>>13680294
>>13680290
>>13680223
there
Friends don't let friends 4chan drunk
>>13680292
Nigger I ain't even seen the movie. I don't even care. I just know you're hillariously crippled.
>>13679335
there are some things that came out of the EU that I liked, quite a number of them, this isn't one of them
>>13680290
>>13680309
That young novel series was non-canon in EU.
>>13680309
In EU, that series was labeled part of the Infinities timeline meaning it was non-canon. Just like alternate comic where Vader doesn't die in RoTJ and paints his armor white.
>>13680310
>>13680315
The 'crushgaunt' indentifier doesn't come from that series.
Curious, the "TRAITOR" scene would have served Phasma's character better had she been the one doing the beating instead of a random trooper but if they changed it to phasma how would they go around entering to lowering the shield?
>>13680318
The crushgauntlet has nothing to do with Vader and the Prince of Jedi young adult reader books isn't part of that continuity either way.
>>13680318
>>13680315
>>13680310
It being a Crushgaunt comes up in Darth Vader: A 3D Reconstruction and in Star Wars Insider.
>>13680322
Again, those books are not where it gets identified as a crushgaunt. See >>13680323
>>13680325
None of that has anything to do with the fucking Force Absorb power Vader has.
>>13680327
scroll on up to >>13679335
>>13680328
And its wrong. Get over it nigga.
>>13680328
Film novelization > ambiguous "guide' book.
>>13680323
>>13680328
The I, Jedi books specifically cite Vader as having a rare Force talent for absorbing and redirecting energy that Horn shares which allowed him to absorb the energy of the blaster bolts too. I don't know which takes precedence, but there's no reason it can't be both and both are similarly in questionable canonicity at the moment given the Disney acquisition.
>>13680328
You are being half-truthful here at best. And said guide-book is written "in" universe. The novelization of TESB and all other sources directly state or imply Vader is using the Force. Its called Tutamanis which is why Yoda does against both Dooku and Sidious in Episode II and Episode III.
Even said guide book talks about Vader's Force powers.
