What is this book about?
What is one supposed to take away from it?
What are the arguments that he is trying to prove?
What would you give as a quick synopsis.
I really have no idea about the subject matter of philosophy so help would be appreciated.
I have no basis on the direction of logic that I can use to interpret this book.
Is it no matter your perspective, it exists?
why would you want to read Nagel if you don't already into philosophy, OP?
>>8282476
That was his first suggestion.
Ill leave this thread up for an hr and a half and see where it has gone when I return.
>>8282481
umm who's he
>>8282495
psychiatrist
