>On a thousand bridges and piers shall they throng to the
You are currently reading a thread in /lit/ - Literature
>On a thousand bridges and piers shall they throng to the future, and always shall there be more war and inequality among them: thus does my great love make me speak! Inventors of figures and phantoms shall they be in their hostilities; and with those figures and phantoms shall they yet fight with each other the supreme fight! Good and evil, and rich and poor, and high and low, and all names of values: weapons shall they be, and sounding signs, that life must again and again surpass itself!
And people try to tell me that Nietzsche didn't read Stirner? Please.
>>8281842
>quoting a translation
>>8281882
>translations can't be accurate
>>8281842
He also didn't read Kierkegaard, but both went on about recurrence or return or whatever you want to quote. No doubt the phantom thing like the spook thing is to do with Hegel's Time-Ghost.
>>8281842
>And people try to tell me that Nietzsche didn't read Stirner?
Who tried to tell you this?
>>8281909
Confirmed for not understanding Hegel.
Oh look another shit thread
>>8281944
I'm going to need more than that to understand wtf you're saying bro.
If you mean phantom/spook is not the same as geist in Hegel, at least on Nietzsche's part that's likely to be because it's a criticism. I assume spook is something similar but I'm not familiar with Stirner.
>>8281889
true