So now that we are no longer bound by the mind matter dualism but are facing a resurgent metaphysics based on emergence and vertical and horizontal pluralism(i.e. different levels of being: physics, chemistry, biology, psych, culture all with their own emergent and unique proporties and seperate non reducible ontology) and religion is coming back to the forfront as a driving force should we update our understanding of god as well? In what way?
After all, god is a personification, a literary subject through which we express our frustrations or that stands for the powers which we cannot control or cannot make sense of.
The ancient personal addressing towards problems in personified form might still have a place as long as we set the rules of interaction with such god or gods properly as a result of our contemporary understanding of the world.
>>8275667
simply that "god" is the principle of absoluteness and completeness, and that everything else is an aspect of this totality.
>>8275667
>emergent
Means nothing
>>8275835
Emergency emergency, this anon having emerged from his mother's funny smelling cunt over two decades ago has never experienced an emergent property, or even seen an emergent tree in the woods
Again, pic related.
You shall not escape my benevolence, goddamn it. You will notice the distinct lack of Lacan. That should be an indicator of my sanity.
>inb4 Freud
I get it, but you have to separate the bullshit from the discovery of the unconscious, and you must read Freud to understand Jung better.
After Jung, Gebser is the final-boss in the list
>>8276684
So like, if I read the Golden Bough, what am I getting into?
>>8276720
>what am I getting into?
A masterpiece of comparative mythology.
>>8276684
You'll obviously want to touch up on your mythology.
>>8276684
Of course a woman would write a book about shamanism and extecy. Why are women so degenerate when you let them loose?
>>8276768
>Mircea Eliade
>woman
>>8276768
>extecy
>>8276684
why put graves between all those spooks?
