Is speed reading a hoax?
>>8271248
anyone can speed read if you're not looking to gain any depth of knowledge but you're not getting the full experience of the text
>>8271248
you can try it anytime. There are plenty browser-addons out there.
>>8271248
I've found it works for non-fiction, especially non-fiction by journalists or scientists with absolutely no sense of aesthetic prose.
Speed reading good prose is equal to speed eating a great meal or speed fucking someone you love, or speed walking through the Louvre.
>>8271248
Yes
>>8271438
>speed walking through the Louvre.
Kek
>>8271438
>speed walking through the Louvre.
>tfw I did this and I'll probably never get a chance to go back
fugFUCC
do you listen to your music at 3x the speed?
then why read prose that fast
>>8271761
Fucking this. 100x this.
I'm also impressed by the general response in this thread.
And yeah, the irony of speed reading is that you waste your time a little bit faster than everyone else.
