it sounds pretty logic to me.
Vulgar economism is basically a Marxian cult that died with Second International thought
"Scientific" historicism is a relic of the 19th century
So is historical teleology
Most non-Marxist materialist historiography has dealt with the relationship between base and superstructure to the point that simplistic formulations are no longer tenable
Even within the Marxian milieu the same thing has happened (Gramsci, structuralism, poststructuralism)
>>8253730
how are you so certain that it is wrong?
because of 20th century marxism-leninism?
>>8253730
read this
http://sociology.fas.nyu.edu/docs/IO/225/What_is_living_and_what_is_dead_in_the_marxist_theory_of_history.pdf
>>8253730
>Hey /lit/ why is that thing most of us believe is true actually wrong?
>[CONFIRMATION BIAS INTENSIFIES]