What was his problem?
>>8248790
couldn't get laid
>>8248798
Wrong. He was handsome in youth and a renowned womanizer.
white dude
>>8248790
1)people believing fichte had read kant
2)not enough people reading kant
3)idiots worse than fichte reading him
>>8248790
>What was his problem?
Hegel.
>>8248805
Funnily enough, Nietzsche thought Schopenhauer was too harsh on Hegel.
>>8248811
nietzsche also thought we should get rid of grammar
>>8248816
Well, Joyce believed him.
>>8248819
joyce didn't dispense with grammar, he just layered grammars. it's as bad as hegelianism tbvh
>>8248803
I remember him saying that people should read Kant directly, claiming that he was straight-forward writer.
On what planet, I wonder...
>>8248825
What's wrong with Hegelianism bruh.
Serious answers only.
>>8248828
>yfw kant explains his writing style before you start reading
>thinking that isn't straight forward
>falling for hume because he manipulates you with rhetorical tricks
on this planet, you nimrod.
>>8248832
it's the jfmsu of philosophies, look at what all his students and followers went on to do: even the milk shop was a failure because too much spend on style and no thought to how that affects the content. scribblers the lot of them.
>>8248842
>>8248849
kekked, nice
had a bitchy mom
>>8248816
Seriously?
>>8249231
Yeah, he said something along the lines of "we won't be free of gods until grammar dies". He's a philologist so a lot of his stuff is based around grammar (subject and predicate, etc). Normally people baulk immediately at the suggestion, until you bring up their last encounter with a fanatical grammar nazi and they realise they were treading on someone's religious beliefs.
>>8249223
I think he was more pissed off she was popular and well known than bitchy, which is why he was so happy about his prize winning essay.
>>8248805
>>8249260
>>8248790
he was alive
>>8249294
nice, one to beat
>>8248790
He was kind of a dick at times.
>>8249540
that's not his problem tho
>>8248790
He had no problems. He was perfect.
