the fuck you say about iceberg theory, you little bitch?
The fact that critical interpretations of your stories often not only differ wildly but are outright contradictory should tell you that the theory, or at least your application, is complete bullshit.
Now put the gun down, Ernie, we both know the only person you'll ever use it on is yourself.
>>8214773
>implying criticism isn't pure bunko
heh
>>8214773
Your first part sounds like praise.
Stop embarrassing yourself.
>>8214773
>different people have different opinions about a text
>something is wrong with that
i dont like you, you're one of those people who will go out of their way to be upset
>tfw so unsure of your own writing you create a myth that Scott Fitzgerald had a small penis because he was a better writer than you
>>8214773
So that must mean Shakespeare is garbage too, because of the contradictory critical readings of some of his plays.
>>8214975
>Your first part sounds like praise.
That says more about you than his post
>>8215099
Are you honestly implying that a work should only have one possible meaning? How would this even be possible with works that are not straight up storytelling? Is the author the only legitimate reader because he 'knows' what he meant?
