Improve this.
Protip: You can't.
literally spooks: the visual guide
I can improve it by removing Memecoult and the diploma-mill tier econ textbooks
>>8202178
>the diploma-mill tier econ textbooks
Literally best econ textbooks to be created
Shame they're so expensive for a real copy, I feel bad for torrenting it.
>friedman
>>8202185
Nigger they're freshman survey economics books
If you think they're "the best" you haven't read anything but survey books
And no book needs eleven editions. Anything that does that is no longer meant as a learning tool, it's meant as a product.
>>8202153
75% of the people who visit this board are undergrads and pseuds who are, unironically, communists. They will use
> commumeme arrows
to show how hard they disagree with you on your choice of economic texts and that Marx should be on that list alongwith some autistic Marxist Kike or Parisian.
Also notice how they have nothing to say about your choice of books in other sections. It's revealing. How much they think they know about the world, and how little they actually do.
>>8202217
>Marxist Kike
/pol/ go home you're drunk
>>8202205
>Nigger they're freshman survey economics books
Yes... I meant good books for babbys.
I downloaded it and read it and liked it
>>8202217
>75% of the people who visit this board are undergrads and pseuds who are, unironically, communists
That's most of 4chan
Do you expect NEETs to not be socialists or something?
the covers for case fair oster are perfect tbqh
>>8202222
>>8202227
Notice this further. I don't frequent /pol/.
But these people love to build strawmen, they love creating caricatures that their kike professors have taught them to tear down. Since I expressed an opinion that can be (doesn't have to be) one professed by someone on /pol/, I MUST be a /pol/er (?). It is a pathetic show, a revelation, of their weakness, and an excellent demonstration of the outer limits of their mental acuity.
>>8202222
>>8202227
>>8202244
Literally their only arguments are "/pol/ go away"
>>8202239
>they love creating strawmen
Says the guy who accused 3/4s of a board of being undergrad pseuds who love Marx based on the fact that a whole two posts (!!) criticized choices in the econ section
>>8202255
>a whole two posts (!!) criticized choices in the econ section
No, you imbecile. Maybe you should browse more threads, and oftener to see for yourself what the dominant political and economic viewpoints on this board are.
This idiotic retort has been used numerous times over by your kind.
>>8202153
You could improve it by removing Friedman and Kissinger posthaste.
>>8202217
>they know nothing about the world but i do
classic ideology
>>8202217
so, this is the power of autisrn
>>8202275
>>8202259
>>8202244
>>8202227
samefag
>>8202217
not an argument
>>8202217
maybe they're commenting on the economics texts because capitalism and freedom is the most popular book listed.
>>8202217
Is it appalling that everyone isn't a right-libertarian?
>>8202289
No shit dude she has a tripcode.
>>8202378
>she
I love pointless shit flinging
>>8202205
so what are some good books then?
>>8202153
>>Hobbes and Rousseau on the same list
>>8204557
>(Critical Thought and Competing Ideologies)
>Capitalism and Freedom
my nigga
>>8204560
>>only having one perspective about international relations and economics.
>>critical thought.
>No Plato, Kant or Witty
might as well read hop on pop
>>8202279
>>8204561
based
>>8202153
Nice spooks m8
>>8204922
kek
>>8202678
For economics? Well Blanchard is good for Macro, I'd suggest it because it is very simple for babbies/undergrads and it tries very, very hard to bring up relevant case studies so you aren't just lost in theory (a common attitude for people only interested in acing exams, or people who could give a damn about anything except entertaining models that are challenging to learn).
Debraj Ray's book for Dev. Econ is pretty good for the same reasons.
For Micro maybe Pyndick.
Generally, google is your friend. Search for undergrad econ courses and see what books they use, follow those and you should be fine.
If you have questions sadly econs are not so active on the internet at the amateur level.
Economics stackexchange is a little lame, inactive and poorly educated, other than that econjobrumors.com is the /sci/ for econgrads (anonymous message board) that has a lot of trolling but, just like /sci/, if you know how to hurt their egos and can ask sensible questions that challenge their intelligence you can probably use the bright minds on there.
/sci/ itself is probably not too useful for econ but meh.
>>8205294
Oh yeah, almost forgot, you won't need this soo much for undergrad econ but Chiang's book on math econ is a must if you want to stand a chance at understanding anything spewed at the grad level (I'm assuming you are as shiet at mathematics as the average /lit/ poster)
