>>8174027
allow me to post meme relating to black man and the king word next to it (get ready this is hilarious): we wuz kings (the implication being that blacks were never kings but they try to make shakespeare and egypt black to justify them not being inherently inferior to the white man)

YOU
WEREN'T
KINGS

consider yourselve BTFO

>>8174038
???

the /pol/ shitposting is getting really incoherent

>>8174040
wanna argue that blacks were kings? not kings as we understand it. they were kings, maybe in etiopia, but they werent civilized and hence the WE WUZ KINGS meme is valid to combat that idea

>>8174053
who are you talking to

take your meds, schizo

>>8174070
or keep talking to yourself that works too

fuck off mde

>>8174027
it's really shitty. the fag elliott hulse likes it

>>8174027
Looks very interesting, ill look into it

>>8174038

wow just seeing the word king triggered you that hard, you might want to seek some help bro like the other guy said

>>8174114
don't bother, if they're either a schizo or a 'just pretending to be retarded' mouthbreather, in either case encouraging them is detrimental

>>8174146
thanks for ruining my thread dickhead

>>8174027
I haven't read the series, the advice I was given was to just read the one book. And I loved it. Its very readable and insightful. I've kept Moore's quote in mind for the longest time, we are not in a patriarchy but a puer-archy, toxic man children stunted in their ways.

I liked reading about the shadow functions/versions and found myself seeing them enacted in my day to day life. I loved the comparison to king herod in relation to an ideal king. The toxic king seeking to destroy the youth, the new king, or rather the urge to cripple someone else's development.

Great book, great ideas, great speaker.

Moore has a number of free lectures on his site that I recommend, his other book facing the dragon is also great. Moore led me to betwixt and between and helped me understand the importance of rites of passage.