Which is more prestigious?

Thread replies: 6
Thread images: 1

Anonymous
Which is more prestigious? 2016-06-08 22:05:38Post No. 8141365
[Report] Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

File: rahndum.jpg (19KB, 400x375px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

19KB, 400x375px

Which is more prestigious? Anonymous 2016-06-08 22:05:38 Post No. 8141365 [Report]

Books on a shelf arranged in old fashion in order to impress people, or random book biles that accumulate like grains of sand on the beach of your intellect?

Hard mode: is it even cooler to just not have any hard copies? But then what about rare coffee table joints?

<Pic not mine

>>

Anonymous 2016-06-08 22:19:29 Post No.8141429
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-06-08 22:19:29 Post No.8141429 [Report]

Books on a shelf arranged by their numbers in the Dewy Decimal System is obviously the best choice.

>>

Anonymous 2016-06-08 22:29:16 Post No.8141481
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-06-08 22:29:16 Post No.8141481 [Report]

both. books on a shelf but then you have too many books so they spill over onto various surfaces in the room

>>

Anonymous 2016-06-08 23:40:19 Post No.8141766
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-06-08 23:40:19 Post No.8141766 [Report]

>>8141365
>>8141481

Kill yourselves, if you need to think about this, you are way too vain...

>>

Anonymous 2016-06-08 23:50:13 Post No.8141804
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-06-08 23:50:13 Post No.8141804 [Report]

>>8141365
>christopher moore
>not mine
better fuckin not be.

>>

Anonymous 2016-06-09 00:01:08 Post No.8141848
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-06-09 00:01:08 Post No.8141848 [Report]

Coolest is not to have any books, cause then you're not a poser like OP.