>>8137067
go to bed, Jim

>>8137067
How can we tackle this philosophically?

>>8137072
I think he's already dreaming.

>>8137091

Serious reply: consider reading the work of Marshall McLuhan and later his son's work, who followed him (pic related).

Also have a look at the other Thunders (and not just that first one). They seem to suggest various aspects of human life, although Mcluhan favored shoehorning them in as memes, to fit his stages of technology speculations.

>>8137091
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TV3vT5nW_I4

>>8138631
which is more amazing, that someone was actually able to find meaning in this clusterfuck of a word, or that someone bothered to do so?