I hated this book. The main character felt utterly ridiculous and in no way realistic let alone relatable - which made it even more of a disappointment because it didn't make up for the senseless drivel of the first part of the book.

>>8105863
C&P

>>8105863
crime and punishment and then brothers karamazov. after youve done them you can do any of the others, but those two are obligatory.

the double

>>8105875
>>8105863
From what I remember I really loved Notes from Underground. I noticed in the first half of the book that I was rooting for the Man from Underground and felt sympathetic towards his worldview. Than halfway through the book I started to detest him, saw how pathetic and malign he was, the book made me question how I perceived myself to be, and that in the end I too in a way was being pathetic and wicked in the way I perceived the world and everyone around me. All in all I loved it though I probably haven't given it the attention it deserves.

>>8105875
it's literally /r9k/ embodied. same with book of disquiet i got memed on hard with that one. don't know if i can finish it tbqh

>>8105927
>book of disquiet
i think the consensus on this is that you're not supposed to read it through like a novel.

it's a collection of thoughts: you can drop it or pick it up wherever you like without missing any continuity or story, because there is none.

>>8105934

It does seem very beta.

>>8105884
Having read Notes and then C&P (but not Brothers yet) I can confirm that this is the best thing to do now. But to be honest from what I have seen so far I would replace Brothers with The Double.

>>8106871
don't listen to this guy, Brothers K is the magnum opus

>>8105875
That's the point. He's supposed to make you question your SADBOII-ness

>>8105921
This is exactly how I felt.

>>8105875
Normies out.

>>8105875
>>8105921
>>8105927
>>8106389
>>8107204
>>8108634

>completely misinterpreting the book

>>8109187
Then how would you interpret it?