>>8100654
Read it and find out yourself you lazy bitch

>>8100654
No, it's a very interesting book.

>>8100673
Thanks I bought it because I played the game based on it and enjoyed it, so I was wondering if I wasted my money buying something based solely on its relation to something else.

>>8100677
well the game's story is almost the same as in the book so if you're reading for plot, which ofcourse you shouldn't do, but in case you do, then it's kind of a waste

>>8100657
Welcome. You must be new here

Anyone ever notice how many threads we have of OP buying a book and then asking our opinion on it, without having read it yet? What goes through the brains of people like this? Wouldn't it make more sense to ask before buying?

Or how about actually reading the damn thing, and then make a thread what you thought of it, and ask for opinions?

I don't get these dumb threads.

>>8100654
You already bought it. Why don't you start reading it and find out? Also no, you didn't waste your money. It's an interesting book.

>genre fiction
>Did I waste my £8.99 /lit/
is this a rhetorical question?

>>8101272
oh it's definitely a problem. if you want things to change, make a macro and constantly harass these mouthbreathing idiots out of here

>>8100697
Why should I not read for the plot?

>>8102112
it is /lit/.
They would prefer a story about a man eating shit for dinner if it had good prose

>>8102135
I would indeed read that, if it had good prose that is