Philfag here. I have a philosophy professor at Harvard who I feel was intellectually abusing his philosophy undergrads. He assigned us inhuman amounts of philosophy homework and taught his classes like we were born already doing graduate philosophy while still gestating in our mother's wombs. He even smugly enjoined (probably jokingly though) that anyone who wasn't at the level of Wittgenstein or Kant intellectually speaking would be better off dropping the course; that, he said would intellectually behoove them in the long-run. He forced us to read the Critique of Pure Reason in less than a week and a half, expecting anyone who couldn't symbolically or modally represent the chapters on Transcendental Aesthetic, to wit, Kant's proofs of space-time being an a priori form of intuition that made experience possible, that they'd be dropped from the course de facto: they'd receive, automatically, the lowest grade.
Not only that, but when we couldn't represent parts of Hegelian logic using Kripke–Platek set theory in class he'd call us idiots or retards. Obviously he has tenure or else he wouldn't say those things. If we riposted with anything, he'd say the Holy Ghost is watching and he's gonna send us to hell. This, patently meant that we'd get a low grade. Everyone already knew that. It was almost impossible to get an A in that class unless you were able to turn the whole field of philosophy on its head. For him an A was completely original work, Socratic/Kant-tier.
The class is dehumanizing, dreadful, and I have no other choice but to keep learning with him because my focus intertwines with his. At the same I love philosophy, but I can't handle learning with this guy. He's even blackmailed students who didn't complete their homework, and literally stopped teaching the class one day to find a student who didn't show up. It's fucking ridiculous. I need help.
Pic related, he made this face every time we were doing something wrong or just before he'd call us a "Derridean idiot."
What should I do?
>>8093663
spooks_spurdo.png
If this is true i wish i was in your class.
stay in the class so you can write a book about him afterward. make sure to also write in some eccentric/lovable teacher who gets fired by the big bad boss. also write in a love interest with a big butt. then, make lots of money.
>>8093663
/r/thatHappened
Given the responses, sounds like I'm fucked for the next several years
>>8093663
>What should I do?
learn how to use commas
>>8093711
I was actually going say that I wasn't going to bother proofreading in the OP, but then I just stopped caring.
Next time you walk into class knock him out. If you are a weakling use a three inch piece of pipe. While he is blubbering on the ground like a little pussy tell him that this is a calliclean refutation of philosophy.
>>8093738
this tbhfam
>>8093738
Haha this made my day. I wish. I don't have the intellectual balls though. This is probably why I can't get an A in any of his courses.
Sack up and become a Philosopher King or drop the course.
>>8093756
While it is true that Plato expected everyone to know geometry before an valid acceptance into the academy, he didn't call them idiots nor did he blackmail them. This teacher might be a sort of Whiplash-esque dream for members on this board, but he's an asshat and he doesn't act like a true philosopher.
>>8093765
>but he's an asshat and he doesn't act like a true philosopher.
No true Scotsman, seriously? Stop complaining, you're lucky.
>>8093770
He's more of a Diogenes than a Plato, fine.
>>8093663
seems like your teacher is quite the autistic little man
>>8093776
>He's more of a Diogenes than a Plato
Do you still not realize how fortunate you are? Studying at Harvard? Good god. Just put up with him a while longer.
>>8093789
Admittedly, I have done things I never knew I could do. You have a good point. I've thought about suicide while taking his courses though. I've had to start taking anti-depressants.
>>8093770
Maybe it is No True Scotsman, but OP obviously has an implicit definition of philosopher he's working with. CAN a true lover a wisdom be an asshole? Doesn't meanness, crudity, and fear make people worse? Shouldn't wisdom make people better? Shouldn't someone who loves wisdom love what it does (make people better) and try to do it in all things?
I know there's an alternative notion: a philosopher is an expert is some skill, and skilled craftsman sometimes use reward/punishment to teach their skill, so an ass-kicking philosopher isn't a controdiction. But I'd argue 1) a philosopher isn't a craftsman and 2) even a craftsman who teaches is still trying to make someone better at their skill, and should always keep that end in view. The abuse OP described doesn't sound like a craftsman teaching a skill, he just sounds like an asshole.
>>8093789
And he knows I'm Jewish too. He has something against me. He's an old fuck, but an anti-semitic one. It's going to be even harder getting good grades in his courses with that bias in hand.
>>8093802
I imagine Diogenes was an asshat too. He walked away from one of his students who wanted to get taught by him without saying a word. I forget the exact details of the case, but I think the student was a strict Parmenidean monist who abjured motion in all cases.
>>8093797
Maybe you've learned how to grind, which is a valuable skill. But have you deepened your love of learning thanks to his class?
Your professor sounds like a dick who should save that shit for grad students. A liberal arts education at Harvard should be broader are more joyful imho. You want potential philosophers to come out the otherside of undergrad with their wonder and curiosity still intact, with a wide familiarity with Western culture to boot. Grad school is the time for becoming a professional.
>>8093797
serious?
dude you need thicker skin
if he's like that to everyone it's not even personal, you can just think "this has nothing to do with me, this guy is just an asshole" and let that shit roll off you like water off a duck's back
think of it as a class in dealing with assholes in power. Thats a much more practical lesson to learn than the minutia of philosophy, anyhow.
Is this pasta or what?
If not, beat him with a tire iron while reciting passages from Zarathustra
>>8093797
What's the name of the professor?
>>8093765
>professor of philosophy
>philosopher
Pick one muchacho
>>8093817
>But have you deepened your love of learning thanks to his class?
I have learned ungodly amounts of things about philosophy while taking his courses and, like I already stated, have become a sharper thinker. The process isn't as fun though. But the information I have consumed is divine, I will admit.
>>8093663
You know what to do, OP.
Catch him off guard with pic related.
Call every piece of work he dares to assign a spook. Wait patiently for him to reveal his philosophical preferences, and then, when he's in the middle of waxing lyrical about them, loudly proclaim in front of everyone that he is spooked.
If he tries to punish you, merely claim you are the Unique One, the Creative Nothing that cannot be punished.
When he finally starts trying to reason with you, state that you are prepared to overlook all of his shenanigans if he joins your Union of Egoists.
>>8093815
He was clever wit who forced other philosophers to confront their pretensions and maybe have a laugh at the absurdity of some of their propositions. I know of know stories where he abused young learners. In the version of your story which I heard, it wasn't a student, just a dime-a-dozen Eleatic who was ripe for satire.
>>8093828
I've already gotten a thread deleted when I started mentioning names. I'm going to have to abstain, sorry.
>>8093663
moran...?
i honestly don't believe you op
the jew thing especially, harvard's a third jewish
>>8093738
This.
>>8093663
You're just a bitch. If you can't even handle an intelligent egomaniac, you're never going to survive in the field once you graduate. Tbh, I'd kill to take a class like that. You think getting called Derridean idiot is bad? Get back to me when you write your whole life without getting acknowledged for it like Schopenhauer or Nietzsche. Your professor is doing the field of philosophy a favor by thinning out entitled brats like you. We should thank him for saving us from the ideas of minds like yours.
>>8093843
boyle
>>8093838
This.
>>8093821
>think of it as a class in dealing with assholes in power.
That's another good lesson to learn from this teacher, I guess. I just think it sucks that undergrad departments have fallen so far that lessons like this and "how to grind" are the best you can hope for from some classes.
What about keeping the wonder and respect for Western tradition alive? Where else are liberal arts undergrads gonna have a chance to do that? They're certainly not gonna go on to do that from grad school, or learn it from wider society. Undergraduate institutions are supposed to be finishing school for good citizens, not more cogs in the capitalist machine.
>>8093838
Is there a single person outside of this board who takes Stirner seriously?
>>8093853
>PhD from Pittsburgh
>>8093840
Bullshit. You're a troll.
>>8093871
Pittsburgh is among the top 5 philosophy departments in the world.
>>8093875
Pittfag detected
No it isn't
>>8093848
God you sound just like him. He's even said some of the same things.
>>8093663
>philosophy undergrads
>What should I do?
I think you already know.
>>8093871
you don't know shit about phil, bud
>>8093875
>He thinks modern universities are of any intellectual value
Wew lad.
>>8093853
PHIL 158x or PHIL 129?
>>8093881
Never went to college so I wouldn't know which institution has the most undeserved reputation
I'm light years ahead of all those academic clowns anyway, as will soon become apparent
>>8093663
Musicfag here. I have a jazz instructor at Shaffer who I feel was intellectually abusing his studio band students. He assigned us inhuman amounts of new material and held his rehearsals like we were born already playing bebop heads while still gestating in our mother's wombs. He even smugly enjoined (probably jokingly though) that anyone who wasn't at the level of Joe Jones or Buddy Rich musically speaking would be better off dropping the course; that, he said would musically behoove them in the long-run. He forced us to play Whiplash perfectly without ever practicing together as a band, expecting anyone who couldn't recognize that he's out of tune or tempo, by ear, having absolute pitch and the ability to count tempo in your head being an a priori form of intuition that made music possible, that they'd be dropped from the course de facto: they'd receive, automatically, the lowest grade.
Not only that, but when we couldn't play Caravan's double-time swing in quarter note 330 in class he'd call us idiots or retards. Obviously he has tenure or else he wouldn't say those things. If we riposted with anything, he'd say "not quite my tempo". This, patently meant that we'd get kicked from the band. Everyone already knew that. It was almost impossible to get into the core band in that class unless you were able to turn the whole field of jazz on its head. For him a core performance was completely original work, Louis Armstrong/Charlie Parker-tier.
The class is dehumanizing, dreadful, and I have no other choice but to keep learning with him because my focus intertwines with his. At the same I love music, but I can't handle learning with this guy. He's even blackmailed students who didn't complete their homework, and literally stopped teaching the class one day to talk about one of his more ambitious students from previous generations who had just killed himself. It's fucking ridiculous. I need help.
Pic related, he made this face every time we were doing something wrong or just before he'd call us a "a worthless friendless faggotlipped little piece of shit, whose Mommy ran out on Daddy once she realized he wasn’t Eugene O’Neill."
What should I do?
>>8093889
Cute.
I still come in vain to /lit/ for conversation (fucking wishful thinking), but stay for the good stuff like this.
>I work on a range of topics in metaphysics and epistemology that overlap with philosophy of science. (Which is to say: the best topics in metaphysics and epistemology.) Are there “fundamental” laws of nature? What are they – as distinct, say, from accidentally true generalizations, or the causal generalizations that seem to figure in the special sciences? Suppose it’s a truism that one of the central aims of scientific inquiry is to uncover the causal structure of our world (at many different time- and length-scales); what does “causal structure” need to mean, for this truism to be not merely true but illuminating? What are the varieties of probability, and can any of them be said to be properly “objective”? What would it take for one science to “reduce” to another? Must fundamental physics have an intelligible ontology – and if so, what does this constraint amount to? Is there any need for a conception of ‘metaphysical possibility’ that outstrips physical possibility? Can there be any basis for skepticism about unobservable structure that is not also, and equally, a basis for skepticism about unobserved structure? (And so on.) I firmly believe that philosophical discourse always goes better if the parties involved resolutely avoid any “burden-shifting” maneuvers, and that teaching always goes better if you bring cookies.
It functions to weed out the memers. He knows who will succeed in the area of study and what it takes. Why let the student waste their time, why let the student waste his time? He is like a coach giving hard practices. Stay dedicated, focused, and diligent and he'll look you in the eye at the end, and you'll have a moment of recognition, a silent nod of respect. You are one of the unmemed, a lover of knowledge. Not an intellectual equal obviously but man. A man.
>>8093892
>in vain
>not in vein
Do you even shitpost m8?
>>8093892
I mean, it's not like we all aren't thinking the same.
>>8093738
Top kek.
>>8093877
I've never even been to Pittsburgh. It just happens to have an excellent philosophy department, as reflected in global rankings.
>>8093838
This thread is really delivering.
>>8093897
OP here. This post for some reason gave me a shit ton of motivation. Feel like going on a run. Might actually start working on my thesis early on. Pretty sure I got the prerequisite knowledge now. Although the thread is full of shitposts, this helped me a ton, whilst being funny.
Fuck...
later anons.
>>8093870
there probably isn't a single person outside of this board who knows who Stirner is, save from the occasional anarchist. if more people knew who he was and actually read him, he'd probably be taken a lot more seriously.
>>8093891
Fling a chair at him.
>struggling in liberal arts subject
>>8093936
OP was focusing on philosophical logic and math you pleb
>>8093909
>global rankings
Lel based on what? Academic output? Elo score? IQ? Number of brown people in the department?
>>8093838
>OP's face when he doesn't take this advice
>I argue that a variety of influential accounts of self-knowledge are flawed by the assumption that all immediate, authoritative knowledge of our own present mental states is of one basic kind. I claim, on the contrary, that a satisfactory account of self-knowledge must recognize at least two fundamentally different kinds of self-knowledge: an active kind through which we know our own judgments, and a passive kind through which we know our sensations. I show that the former kind of self-knowledge is in an important sense fundamental, since it is intimately connected with the very capacity for rational reflection, and since it must be present in any creature that understands the first-person pronoun. Moreover, I suggest that these thoughts about self-knowledge have a Kantian provenance
This retard is a tenured professor of philosophy at Harvard
>>8093922
>if more people knew who he was and actually read him, he'd probably be taken a lot more seriously.
Heh.
If people actually read his edgy shit, they'd long for those halcyon days when they had no idea of anything 'Stirner'.
>>8093948
>passive kind through which we know our sensations
So this retard has only just discovered what 'instinct' is?
>>8093950
heh, this post was adorable
Top memes and OP got reinvigorated.
Ship this thread to the hall boys
>>8093922
i have no occupation with readings right now so
where should I start with Stirner ? What is his most rewarding and enjoyable work?
>>8093965
I think he only produced one work of note; The Ego and its Own.
>>8093965
Ego and Its Own lays down his philosophy fairly well tbhfam. Just start there and call me in the morning.
>>8093663
You put up with all of it, learn something, and ace the class.
>>8093663
>What should I do?
Do what any other self-respecting student would do in a class which they cant stand, but where they still want a good grade...
...blowjobs.
>>8093950
Fucking this.
The whole idea of a 'spook' has been abused to death on this board; people just throw it at anything they don't like, under the impression that 'spooks' trump all. It's the philosophical equivalent of that stupid metaphor with the pigeon shitting all over the chess board.
Basically it implies "Lol, I don't care" to any idea people don't like.
>>8093957
I'd say sensations are more immediate than anything. They have a sort of urgency bordering on impertinence. Plato wrote about 'the mob of the senses'.
If I stick a knife in your leg, I don't think you're going to be passively aware of it
>>8093925
>>8093973
This is some good advice. If you want a better grade, make sure to swallow as well.
You're lucky to have a professor who cares and who forces you to work hard and learn. Now get off the internet and hit the books.
>>8093979
I'm sorry for making a bad joke, Anon. How should I repay you for this grave injustice?
>>8093987
stop posting, lurk moar
>>8093948
>what s empirical reasoning
>what is instinctive reasoning
>but I need all these extra words to make me sound smarter than I really am
[/spoiler]Is your professor a woman?[/spoiler]
>>8094021
It's the professor OP is complaining about
>>8093663
>this is all definitely true guys, didn't make anything up
>>8094125
Worthwhile post
That's sarcasm :)
>>8094164
Glad you took the time to respond.
:^)
>have excellent experience with my first university philosophy teacher
>speaks in plain English, engages in dialogue with students to fortify his lectures
>funny af
>the mind still hungers, class leaves a lot to be desired in terms of specifics
>"hey I think I'll take THIS course!"
>unknown to me, the teach is a world-renowned obese libertarianfag
>university's resident and most famous philosopher
>go to class
>obese fuck lumbers through the door
>saxophone_music.mp3
>spends the rest of the class not explaining concepts, just paces to and fro staring at the ground murmuring to himself, inaudibly
>all I want to do is burst out laughing
>first thing he assigns is Rawls
>blah blah the law, justice, burp
>tfw I live in America and philosophy is decidedly unsexy
>tfw no zizeks and foucaults to expound on fist fucking or Nietzsche, entertaining even if I disagree
And that folks is why the best Anglo minds have gravitated towards literature and not philosophy, all our traditions are boring as fuck.
>>8094626
0/10.
>>8093663
Thank that teacher. He is the only training you'll get for real life. Real life is doing one thing for 8 hours a day with at least fairly high amount of concentration and retention. Whether you do what you love or not, this is your post-college (or for the NEETs out there, post-mommy and daddy) existence; be glad you can learn how to do it with something fun like philosophy, and not something soul crushing like office work or flippin burgs.
>>8093663
>J K Simmons staring in the sequel to Whiplash
Critique off All Reason
>>8093840
well with that
s*ged
>>8093891
Underrated post.
I am tempted to believe just because some of the things administrators and professors.
I was at Yale the the early 2000s and there was a story everyone told about Harold Bloom writing nothing but "Admissions Error?" in huge letters on a student's essay.
A lesbian music professor made passes at several girls I knew.
One professor was notorious for having a seminar where, mysteriously, the best fifteen candidates he could find all happened to be nubile young women of at least above-average attractiveness.
There was a master who was buying weed from students and gambling and she basically disappeared without a trace in the middle of a school year.
Another master used to get drunk and swear loudly at official dinners.
Not to mention Anthony LaSaga (too lazy to check spelling but not to type a disclaimer about it) who was arrested for diddling neighborhood kids he was tutoring and keeping videos of it on school property.
Not to mention all the blatant politicizing of classes that had nothing to do with politics. During strikes I had to go all the way to the New Haven People's Center (hmmm) for a class on counterpoint. And there were all these picutres of Castro and Che Guevara and stuff all over the place. I respect the wishes of people who don't want to cross picket lines, but holding your class somewhere else is a statement enough without having to relocate to some Marxist theme park.
Kids these days complain about the microagressions and what not, but back in the day if you said you were depressed you were probably going to get told something like "At least you're not in Iraq." Some amount of abusiveness is almost expected and occasionally even thrilling, like any other genre of initiatory masochism enjoyed by college kids.
>>8096311
>nubile young women of at least above-average attractiveness.
but women in college are ugly.
>>8096343
>he never attended college
haha, oh man.
>>>/worldstarhiphop/
>tfw my astonishment at how the sheer volume of sheltered Ms.Perfect pussy is inconceivable to you
>that perfect girl with the perfect grades and the perfect afterschool activities
>implying she didn't end up at some Ivy, getting ejaculated upon by multitudes of moneykid Chads xanax'd out of her mind in some secret society ritual
>tfw ywn be a Chad of such incredible breeding and caliber
>tfw even in the best of all possible worlds, you could only hope to be a second choice middle class obscurity Lacoste polo Chad who maybe gets the 8/10s
>mfw this isn't my face
>>8096476
I did, old hags are not attractive
>>8096501
>sexual proclivities tend towards the minors of the fairer sex
Ah, ok. Makes sense now. Point well taken good sir. I stand corrected.
>>8093702
>knowing anything about reddit
you have to go back
>>8093944
>thinking anyone cares about blacks outside of the US
>>8096512
*tips katana*
I'd kill myself to drop out of my engineering school and major philosophy....let alone studying in Harvard.
Studying in Japan, there are some professors who refuse to "babysit" students, for true human capitals are revealed in pressured environment.
I personally find those notion bullshit as I can program much faster/better without anyone around ; not with badger who can't stop flaming....and yet
OpenBSD wouldn't have hq code without Theo's compulsive bullying and my school's optics & material science labs won't make that much money & fame without all those asshats forcing their students to choose btw suicide and accepted paper, so I guess it's best to "learn alone and study together" with this kind of situation.
Can you elaborate on "my focus intertwines with his"?
>>8093802
You don't want every philosopher to be babysitting elementary school teacher and yet this is undergrad class right?
I guess human empathy is not included in "craftsmanship" of explaining thinking process of human itself.
>>8093663
>If we riposted with anything, he'd say the Holy Ghost is watching and he's gonna send us to hell
you almost had me
>>8093896
Einstein proved that space-time doesn't give a shit about human mind's existence.
Quantum physics has shown that reality and observer are not separable.
BBL when we make bigger accelerator or telescope.
I'm a philo major and most of my professors have no pulse and let every single dude lmao retard who wants to interrupt the class with their pointless interjections do so. I wish I had a teacher like yours
I'm seriously having a dissociative episode because of this thread
The OP was obviously a joke three sentences in. It's a joke. It's obvious that it's a joke. I don't even mean that like, oh, you should have noticed that it's a joke ;), I mean like it's deliberately right out in the fucking open on purpose.
But everyone in the thread is like
>HEHE.. YOU *ALMOST* HAD ME UNTIL THE FIFTH PARAGRAPH >:P
>I don't believe you, man! Post pictures of your professor for proof, man!
>things that never happened for 11 alex XDD
Like holy fuck, there are two possibilities: either I just tunneled into a universe where everyone is ten times the level of retarded I'm used to, or everyone spontaneously and uniformly decided to pretend not to get the joke for some weird meta-joke reason I can't understand
>>8097695
you don't need real alcohol to be drunk with your friend.
>>8097705
are you a chatbot or foreign or what the fuck, what are you trying to say you goddam retard
>>8097695
sorry my man but it's not that impossible that he's telling the truthmaybe you just never got to experience actual, highly competitive higher education and the types of teachers that come with it
>>8093815
Almost all jews do is whine and ruin, this post is proof. The only reason your holocaust received more attention is because you kept on whining. There might be an exception, maybe you could become the exception but you would have to manoeuvre yourself away from what you are like Bobby Fischer.
>>8097739
>it's not that impossible that he's telling the truth
>when we couldn't represent parts of Hegelian logic using Kripke–Platek set theory in class he'd call us idiots or retards
>he'd say the Holy Ghost is watching and he's gonna send us to hell
>couldn't symbolically or modally represent the chapters on Transcendental Aesthetic
also the one reference to anything significance is a puffed-up version of Babby's First Kant to make it sound challenging
also it reads like the Bill Murray copypasta
>de facto
>to wit
i'm seriously frightened that so many people are responding semi-seriously. my brain is scrambling for possible explanations. did most people just not even read it? what is going on?
Shouldve used ratemyprofessor.com
>>8093663
>implying your professor has the amount of knowledge or intellect of Socrates, Kant, Schopenhauer, Nietzsche, or any other decent philosopher
>implying your teacher isn't constantly having an internal struggle of recognition that he will never be great
>implying the fact that tenured professors like this don't exist at all of the top schools
>implying tenure should even exist
>>8098313
It's called New Sincerity bruv. Irony doesn't exist anymore. Memes are all sincere now. We accept all as equally-plausible.
>>8093948
the idiot menaged to rediscover transcedental aperception, and the difference between transcedental and empirical aperception. And what is there to argue about? Fucking Kant already argued about it 200 and so years ago. This is just a stupid retelling of Kant's argument, judging by the abstract. Meaningless, unecessary, no working philosopher who is out to make something, to produce some new concepts should concern himself with this proffesorial hogwash.
>or just before he'd call us a "Derridean idiot."
based
>>8093663
>For him an A was completely original work, Socratic/Kant-tier.
You're at Harvard. What's wrong with that? You want easy, go to UMass, buddy.
>>8098352
The OP is a work of fiction, asshat.
>>8093832
Learning is not supposed to be fun.
>>8093965
>start
he only produced one book but you should have at least the sparknotes tier understanding of Hegel.
>>8094626
>libertarian
>first reading is Rawls
Rawls is essentially the anti-christ of libertarianism
Anyways, the four philosophy classes I took in my course of education were
1. An intro to politics class that focused on political philosophy. Taught at a community college by a guy who gave very few fucks, I really liked the class. It was mostly just writing and reading classics, the guy was cynical to the point where even his laughs let on that he was probably thinking about killing himself.
2. A political philosophy class taught by a Muslim feminist from California who was a straight up cunt (though honestly I didn't blame her most of the time). The class was full of retards who couldn't even pass a multiple choice midterm so she had to make a takehome final to make sure she didn't fail 70% of the class and was clearly very angry that she was doing it. It was an introductory class and the previous class had covered it almost fully but due to degree requirements I had to take it anyways. Teacher got pissed off over me saying Sayyid Qutb was a two bit fascist who was no different from Nasser except that he obsessed over the teachings of a long dead Bedouin. She also had a bad habit of repeating utter falsities that I only occasionally bothered to contest, I only attended the class because she graded attendance like the cunt she was.
3. A class on the Greeks taught by a burnout who looked like a homeless guy and came to class barefoot. Actually was a pretty good class, he ended up being pretty knowledgeable and amenable to shit. The entire class, black, white, Asian and the Arab looking guys in the back all let out a collective groan when the purple haired girl in the front started going on a rant about white privilege in ancient Greece. She threw a fit and started crying when I compared Socrates to that one homeless guy who hangs out in front of the grocery store and buys liquor for the kids cause it was insensitive to homeless people.
4. A graduate level course on the ethics of international development. Professor was a portly Canadian guy, nice enough. Bland class without anything exciting, half of the students are already lobotimized once you hit grad school.
>>8098402
Harvard is easy, though.
>>8093663
If not bullshit, what university and what professor? I want to look him up on rate my professor.
>>8093738
lol
>>8093840
who cares
the thread is officially now worthless if you don't, so it won't matter
